the undeposit just withdraws the LP and not call the claim function

[brianshattuck]

Trello card - https://trello.com/c/yvgrgNlJ/687-change-the-call-function-on-the-old-discontinued-farm

[github-actions]

Code review by ChatGPT

[github-actions]

Code Review

This code patch appears to modify a component called FarmStakeButtons, specifically changing how farming actions are handled based on the farming type selected. Here are some observations and suggestions for improvement:

Changes Made:

1. The variable claimRewardsHandler has been replaced with exitFarmingsHandler.
2. Conditions checking against txType have been updated from 'claimRewards' to 'exitFarmings', which reflects the new functionality introduced by the handler.

Potential Issues:

1. Logic Consistency: Ensure that this change is consistent with the underlying functionality of the application. If exitFarmingsHandler is intended to perform a different operation than claimRewardsHandler, there should be clear logic in the context of other components interacting with it.

2. UI Feedback: The feedback message is also tied to the txType. If users previously saw "undepositing" when claiming rewards, consider how users will understand the new operation. If the terminology or expected user actions are different, it may require additional UX considerations or notifications.

3. Error Handling: Since changing the handler function could introduce new error scenarios, ensure that the new handler (exitFarmingsHandler) is adequately handling errors within its implementation. Adding a default error handling state in the UI could also improve robustness.

4. Type Safety: Be cautious about any potential TypeScript errors that could arise from these changes—especially if exitFarmingsHandler has a different type signature compared to the previous handler.

5. Testing: After making changes to the handler functions and the conditions around them, it's important to run tests (if available) and also consider writing new ones if this functionality was not previously covered.

Improvement Suggestions:

1. Code Comments: Adding comments to clarify the intent of changes, especially since the function names suggest a different context, would help future maintainers understand the purpose of the exitFarmingsHandler.

2. Feature Flagging: If this is part of a larger feature set that is still under development, consider implementing a feature flag for testing purposes. This can prevent users from experiencing unfinished functionality.

3. Documentation Updates: Ensure any underlying documentation regarding the farming functions and behaviors is updated to match this change, so that all team members are aware of the new expected behaviors.

4. Performance Considerations: If exitFarmingsHandler involves API calls or state mutations, watch out for performance implications or changes in user experience, especially regarding responsiveness or loading states.

Overall, while the code's immediate changes seem straightforward, careful consideration of the potential implications on functionality and user experience is crucial. Addressing these areas will help mitigate bug risks and improve the overall quality of the code.