Skip to content

Conversation

@chrispbradley
Copy link
Member

Merging Jin's branch and bringing cuda electrophysics up-to-date.

jinthagerman and others added 30 commits January 24, 2011 02:52
…as I am pressed for time. I wouldn't recommend anyone test this yet as makefiles have some harcoded paths from my comp and code is tweaked for my tesla board. Tracker item 2180

git-svn-id: https://opencmiss.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/opencmiss/cm/branches/developers/jin@1916 61e36070-c886-4827-b7c0-ed9e4dc59cc8
…olations when accesssing converted C pointers. No Tracker Item

git-svn-id: https://opencmiss.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/opencmiss/cm/branches/developers/jin@2001 61e36070-c886-4827-b7c0-ed9e4dc59cc8
…ack dae solver timer using COMMON variables in SOLVER_DAE_SOLVE. Temporarily removed single domain timing as it was producing NANs for some reason. See tracker item 2180

git-svn-id: https://opencmiss.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/opencmiss/cm/branches/developers/jin@2125 61e36070-c886-4827-b7c0-ed9e4dc59cc8
Conflicts:
	ExampleMakefile
	Makefile
	src/biodomain_equation_routines.f90
	src/classical_field_routines.f90
	src/diffusion_equation_routines.f90
	src/equations_set_routines.f90
	src/external_dae_solver_routines.cu
	src/field_IO_routines.f90
	src/field_routines.f90
	src/multi_compartment_transport_routines.f90
	src/opencmiss.f90
	src/opencmiss_c.f90
	src/solver_routines.f90
@chrispbradley
Copy link
Member Author

Any comment on this? I'd like to merge it so that I can get everything up-to-date and delete all these branches and get my master correct so that I can branch and start again from clean. Everything is now so confused.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this line should be deleted now that the libraries are included in $(EXTERNAL_LIBRARIES) from MakefileCommon.inc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants