Skip to content

Conversation

@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator

These tests have a few issues, but this patch fixes two of them:

First, it adds the close paren on the 'copyout' clause that was missing.

Second, it corrects the capitalization on the call to 'Test1', which was resulting in the test not being run properly.

This does NOT fix the ill-formed use of loop however.

These tests have a few issues, but this patch fixes two of them:

First, it adds the close paren on the 'copyout' clause that was
missing.

Second, it corrects the capitalization on the call to 'Test1', which was
resulting in the test not being run properly.

This does NOT fix the ill-formed use of `loop` however.
@erichkeane erichkeane requested a review from ajarmusch July 22, 2025 18:32
@ajarmusch
Copy link
Collaborator

I approved them and will merge for now, I made a note for us to take a look at the loop

@ajarmusch ajarmusch merged commit 29e57f2 into OpenACCUserGroup:master Jul 23, 2025
@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I approved them and will merge for now, I made a note for us to take a look at the loop

Thanks!

I was going to open an issue a little later, there are a few problems with the use of 'loop' as far as I can tell throughout the test suite, so I was going to summarize them best I could. Another one where if you give me guidance, I can put a patch together (or you're welcome to do so yourself).

Note I'm finding these things running against clang -fopenacc.

@ajarmusch
Copy link
Collaborator

Feel free to make patches and adjust the issue as needed. I'll be busy over the next couple of weeks, but i'll be able to help more once i'm available again.

Also, just a heads up, PR #86 introduced quite a few changes across the suite. We're currently reviewing them and hope to merge soon. So if you run into something that seems off, it may already be in that PR.

Thank you for taking a look at our suite :)

@erichkeane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Feel free to make patches and adjust the issue as needed. I'll be busy over the next couple of weeks, but i'll be able to help more once i'm available again.

Also, just a heads up, PR #86 introduced quite a few changes across the suite. We're currently reviewing them and hope to merge soon. So if you run into something that seems off, it may already be in that PR.

Thank you for taking a look at our suite :)

Ah, thanks for that link! That is actually submitted from a coworker of mine (though on the fortran/flang team!).

That actually DOES fix a handful of the problems I have (including much/most of #105). So I'd love to see that one merged!

Thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants