Analysis: Dynamic OJP server discovery and safe cluster update strategies

[Copilot]

Analyzed alternatives for dynamic OJP server discovery and strategies for zero-downtime cluster updates. Current static URL configuration (jdbc:ojp[host1:port1,host2:port2]_...) requires application restarts and limits operational flexibility.

Documents Delivered

Executive Summary (394 lines)

• Five discovery mechanisms: DNS (SRV records), Consul/etcd, Kubernetes, Config Server, Cloud-native
• Cost: $81.5K, 12-week implementation
• ROI: 80% ↓ manual ops, 70% ↓ MTTR, 50% ↑ deployment frequency
• Recommendation: Proceed with DNS provider first (4 weeks, low risk)

Technical Analysis (1,066 lines)

• Pluggable ServiceDiscovery interface design
• URL format: jdbc:ojp[discovery:dns:cluster.example.com]_...
• Comparison matrix across complexity, latency, health checking, multi-cloud support
• Security, monitoring, backward compatibility strategies

Operations Guide (1,435 lines)

• Graceful shutdown: drain mode → wait for transactions → terminate
• Rolling updates, blue-green, canary deployment patterns
• Connection tracking and session preservation
• Troubleshooting guide for drain timeouts, partial redistribution

Architecture Diagrams (349 lines)

• Mermaid diagrams: current vs. proposed architectures, shutdown flow, rolling updates
• Interactive visualizations: graph diagrams, sequence diagrams, state diagrams, Gantt charts
• Component relationships and state transitions with color coding
• Includes DNS, Consul, and Kubernetes discovery flows
• Graceful shutdown sequence diagram with 5-phase process
• Rolling update state diagram showing version transitions
• Implementation timeline Gantt chart

Proposed Architecture

public interface ServiceDiscovery {
    List<ServerEndpoint> discoverServers();
    void startRefresh();
    void addEndpointChangeListener(EndpointChangeListener listener);
}

// URL format with fallback
jdbc:ojp[discovery:dns:ojp-cluster|fallback:localhost:1059]_postgresql://...

Implementation Phases

1. Weeks 1-2: ServiceDiscovery interface, URL parser, config
2. Weeks 3-4: DNS provider (SRV records, TTL caching)
3. Weeks 5-6: Server drain API, connection tracking, graceful shutdown
4. Weeks 7-9: Consul/etcd integration with watch API
5. Weeks 10-11: Kubernetes Endpoints API + Watch
6. Week 12: Load testing, chaos engineering, production hardening

Key Design Decisions

Discovery:

• DNS recommended first: minimal dependencies, existing infra, 30s TTL refresh
• Consul/K8s for real-time updates (10s polling, sub-second watch notifications)
• Fallback to static config on discovery failure

Safe Updates:

• Server-side /admin/drain endpoint triggers deregistration + connection wait
• Client-side tracks active connections/sessions per endpoint
• 5-minute default drain timeout, configurable
• Transaction-aware: blocks drain until commit/rollback

Backward Compatibility:

• Dual-mode: static URLs continue working
• Discovery optional via ojp.discovery.enabled=true
• No breaking changes to existing deployments

---

Full analysis: documents/analysis/DYNAMIC_DISCOVERY_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md

Original prompt

I want you to do an analysis on alternatives to dynamically discover OJP servers. We have the ojp servers listed in the connection URL. What would be ways to make it dynamic? also how to safely update the cluster nodes without losing requests, what would be good strategy(ies)?

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[rrobetti]

@copilot use mermaid notation for the diagrams in your analysis

[Copilot]

@copilot use mermaid notation for the diagrams in your analysis

Converted all ASCII diagrams to Mermaid notation in commit 7c12ce8. The architecture diagrams now include:

• Graph diagrams for current/proposed architectures (DNS, Consul, Kubernetes)
• Sequence diagram for graceful shutdown flow with timeline
• State diagram for rolling update strategy
• Component architecture diagram showing layer relationships
• Gantt chart for implementation timeline

The diagrams will now render properly on GitHub with better visual clarity.