📝 docs(readme): update badge URLs

[Onyx-Nostalgia]

• update uv badge URL to use shields.io endpoint
• update Codecov badge to reference main branch

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (28905e6) to head (60590a4).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #5   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           17        17           
  Branches         3         3           
=========================================
  Hits            17        17           

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Onyx-Nostalgia, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on minor but important documentation maintenance within the README.md file. My aim was to ensure the project's badges are up-to-date and correctly linked, improving the accuracy and reliability of the information presented to users and contributors.

Highlights

• README Badge Updates: I've updated the 'uv' badge URL in README.md to transition from a custom icon badge service (custom-icon-badges.demolab.com) to a standard Shields.io endpoint. This change leverages Shields.io's endpoint feature, pointing to a JSON asset for the badge data, which should provide more robust and consistent badge rendering.
• Codecov Branch Correction: I've also corrected the Codecov badge URL in README.md to accurately reflect the project's coverage status on the main branch. Previously, it was referencing a feature-codecov branch, which is no longer relevant for the primary coverage display.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates two badge URLs in the README. The change to the Codecov badge to point to the main branch is a good improvement. I've left a couple of suggestions to improve the long-term maintainability and consistency of the badge definitions.

[Onyx-Nostalgia]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This PR updates badge URLs in the README. The changes are correct in intent, but it seems some duplicate lines were accidentally introduced. There's also a broken badge reference that needs to be fixed. I've provided comments with suggestions to clean up the file.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud