Skip to content

Conversation

@murrown
Copy link
Member

@murrown murrown commented May 19, 2014

Some modifications to get Cyder working on Django 1.6. Maybe we should shoot for 1.7 instead? But anything is better than 1.4.

Tests pass and I haven't been able to tell that anything is wrong from poking around the interface, but a more thorough investigation might be prudent.

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented May 19, 2014

I think I just found an issue. Updating a static interface doesn't seem to work.

@akeym
Copy link
Member

akeym commented May 19, 2014

Anything specific I can do to help evaluate this? Or should I just poke
around as well?

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Nathan Murrow notifications@github.comwrote:

I think I just found an issue. Updating a static interface doesn't seem to
work.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/701#issuecomment-43531357
.

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented May 20, 2014

Yeah, this pull request is still pretty rough so just see what errors you can find. We might not be merging this one for a while.

@church29
Copy link
Contributor

There is a lot of deprecated/renamed django libraries. I tried this at home once. Good luck!

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented May 22, 2014

#644
#689

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented Jul 8, 2014

Incidentally, this pull request requires git submodule update.

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented Jul 8, 2014

Seems like this pull request is failing because of CSRF errors.

@drkitty
Copy link
Contributor

drkitty commented Jan 5, 2015

Is this going to work or should we stay on 1.4 for now?

@murrown
Copy link
Member Author

murrown commented Jan 6, 2015

It does not work and I don't have a plan for making it work. Someone more familiar with the CSRF stuff needs to take a look if we want to go through with it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants