Conversation
Issue #98 was approved as a conservative implementation: structure the official LOST112 and 서울교통공사 workflows instead of pretending a stable public API exists. The new helper builds the documented search payload, the docs explain the v1 hybrid scope, and regression coverage locks the helper plus repo docs into the shipped flow. Constraint: Public subway lost-property APIs remain unconfirmed, so v1 must stay guidance-first Rejected: Full automated scraping of live result tables | unstable without confirmed API/session guarantees Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: Keep this skill on official HTTPS entry points until a stable public API is verified end-to-end Tested: python3 -m unittest scripts.test_subway_lost_property; python3 scripts/subway_lost_property.py --station 강남역 --item 지갑 --days 14 --verify-live; npm run ci Not-tested: Browser-only user journey through LOST112 search submission beyond payload generation
|
REQUEST CHANGES HIGH —
That means the core example the docs/skill tell users to rely on is currently broken in practice, even though the reachability probe passes. The impact is amplified because MEDIUM — Real Result
Recommendation: REQUEST CHANGES |
The review found that the generated subway lost-property curl example still timed out even when the helper's reachability probe passed. This change updates the helper to emit the command shape that actually succeeds against LOST112, tightens the regression test to lock that contract, and aligns the published skill/docs text with the runnable output users now receive. Constraint: LOST112 POST flow requires a referer and does not behave reliably with the prior redirect-following command shape Constraint: Keep the v1 scope hybrid/guidance-only without adding new dependencies or scraping guarantees Rejected: Only add a referer header while leaving the rest of the curl shape unchanged | still reproduced timeouts with the generated command during verification Rejected: Add a live network regression test for the emitted curl command | would make CI flaky and violate deterministic regression expectations Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: If the LOST112 request shape changes again, re-verify the emitted curl command end-to-end before updating docs or tests Tested: python3 -m unittest scripts.test_subway_lost_property; python3 scripts/subway_lost_property.py --station 강남역 --item 지갑 --days 14 --verify-live; generated curl_example executed via shell and wrote lost112-search-result.html; npm run ci Not-tested: Alternate LOST112 item/station combinations beyond the verified 강남역/지갑 example
|
Fixed the review-blocking LOST112 curl guidance so the helper now emits the command shape that actually runs against the official site.
Verification:
|
|
Round 2 review: I reran $code-review plus local verification on the curl-fix path, and I did not find any remaining blocking issues. What I checked:
Real Result
The original blocker from round 1 appears resolved in practice: the helper-generated curl is now runnable against LOST112, the regression covers the required request shape, and the docs/skill no longer over-promise a broken command. Recommendation: APPROVE |
|
Verified the approved LOST112 curl-example fix on
|
|
Round 3 review: reran $code-review plus local verification, and I found one remaining blocker. HIGH — MEDIUM — Real Result
Recommendation: REQUEST CHANGES |
The helper's emitted POST example still timed out against LOST112 in live verification because the 20-second timeout budget was too short for the observed form-submit path. Raise the generated timeout to 60 seconds, lock that contract in the regression, and align the skill/doc wording so users receive guidance that matches the runnable command. Constraint: LOST112 live POST latency can exceed 20 seconds even when reachability probes succeed Rejected: Keep 20 seconds and rely on manual retry | still ships a broken default curl_example Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: If the timeout budget changes again, rerun the exact emitted curl_example against LOST112 rather than only the lightweight reachability probe Tested: python3 -m unittest scripts.test_subway_lost_property Tested: python3 scripts/subway_lost_property.py --station 강남역 --item 지갑 --days 14 --verify-live Tested: npm run ci Not-tested: Long-term LOST112 latency drift beyond the currently observed 60-second budget
|
Addressed the remaining round-3 blocker on
Verification:
|
|
APPROVE Short reason: the previously blocking LOST112 curl-example issue is resolved in the current PR state, and I did not find any remaining merge blockers in the helper/docs/test path. Real Result (verified on 2026-04-10):
Concrete evidence checked:
Residual risk remains limited to external LOST112/서울교통공사 latency or site drift, which is already consistent with the documented v1 hybrid/manual-fallback scope. |
1 participant
Summary
subway-lost-propertyskill for official subway lost-property guidanceVerification
python3 -m unittest scripts.test_subway_lost_propertypython3 scripts/subway_lost_property.py --station 강남역 --item 지갑 --days 14 --verify-livenpm run ci