rulesets: add batch-with-kernel-updates #172
Conversation
wolfgangwalther
left a comment
wolfgangwalther
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This branch should also be added to the no-force-push ruleset.
Also, I think you will need to add it to no-creation as well, otherwise... you can't create it in the first place.
See NixOS/nixpkgs#437208 (comment) for context.
Ma27
force-pushed
the
kernel-update-branch
branch
from
4c01341 to
d436003
Compare
wolfgangwalther
left a comment
wolfgangwalther
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this should work, yes.
|
I discussed the name a lot with @emilazy in NixOS/nixpkgs#437208. While I believe Thus, I agreed with @Ma27 on Matrix to go with I checked - and all branch protection rules already support this branch name accordingly. Thus I only temporarily disable the no-creation-except-release-team rule to allow myself to create the branch, then enabled it again. The |
See NixOS#437208 (comment) Depends on NixOS/org#172 As documented below, the idea is to essentially group all changes rebuilding all VM tests with kernel updates and merge them together into `master` whenever the Linux kernels get updated. This documents the workflow of updates in the nixpkgs manual. While at it, I removed the README from the packages because * it's horribly outdated * I didn't even know it exists which confirms that its discoverability was very poor and added the relevant portions into the nixpkgs manual as well.
See #437208 (comment) Depends on NixOS/org#172 As documented below, the idea is to essentially group all changes rebuilding all VM tests with kernel updates and merge them together into `master` whenever the Linux kernels get updated. This documents the workflow of updates in the nixpkgs manual. While at it, I removed the README from the packages because * it's horribly outdated * I didn't even know it exists which confirms that its discoverability was very poor and added the relevant portions into the nixpkgs manual as well. (cherry picked from commit 9f95c2a)
2 participants
See NixOS/nixpkgs#437208 (comment) for context.
cc @wolfgangwalther @K900 @alyssais