Added ruby gem postrunner #113317

ngiger · 2021-02-16T15:10:58Z

Motivation for this change

Add a ruby gem I use for importing FIT data after jogging

Things done

Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
Built on platform(s)
- [x ] NixOS
- macOS
- other Linux distributions
[x ] Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

I am puzzled, that testing it locally does not work, as show by

nix-build $NIXPKGS -A postrunner
/nix/store/hir9dlqwcxzliakqwzvvmvmn1hhwvk3a-postrunner-1.0.4
result/bin/postrunner --version
Traceback (most recent call last):
9: from result/bin/postrunner:18:in `<main>'
8: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler.rb:149:in `setup'
7: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:20:in `setup'
6: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/runtime.rb:101:in `block in definition_method'
5: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/definition.rb:226:in `requested_specs'
4: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/definition.rb:237:in `specs_for'
3: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/definition.rb:170:in `specs'
2: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/spec_set.rb:80:in `materialize'
1: from /nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/spec_set.rb:80:in `map!'
/nix/store/iwxp1n2manz98yrkznqmpfvq07h4nax6-bundler-2.1.4/lib/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/bundler-2.1.4/lib/bundler/spec_set.rb:86:in `block in materialize': Could not find bindata-2.4.8 in any of the sources (Bundler::GemNotFound)

Running the tests via nix-build nixos/tests/postrunner.nix shows not problem.
But this is the same with gollum (another ruby gem) I tested with.

r-rmcgibbo · 2021-02-16T15:26:18Z

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113317 at c38c471f run on aarch64-linux 1

1 package built:

postrunner

1 suggestion:

warning: unused-argument
Unused argument: bundlerUpdateScript.
Near pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix:1:20:
```
  |
1 | { lib, bundlerApp, bundlerUpdateScript }:
  |                    ^
```

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113317 at c38c471f run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

postrunner

1 suggestion:

warning: unused-argument
Unused argument: bundlerUpdateScript.
Near pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix:1:20:
```
  |
1 | { lib, bundlerApp, bundlerUpdateScript }:
  |                    ^
```

maintainers/maintainer-list.nix

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix

SuperSandro2000

You forgot to add the gemfile which pins the version number.

ngiger · 2021-02-18T07:23:42Z

Added Gemfile. Really a stupid error by me. Thanks a lot for the reviews.

SuperSandro2000 · 2021-02-19T12:30:43Z

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/Gemfile

Can we pin the version here?

I pinned the version there. But I think this violates an assumption of the bundler-update-script (see pkgs/development/ruby-modules/bundler-update-script/default.nix).
But bundler-update-script is not documented and I am still a novice NixOS user.
I would appreciate if @nicknovitski could answer this question.
I would suggest to add
in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-frameworks/ruby.section.md#packaging-executables-that-require-wrapping
a few lines to mention the purpose of bundler-update-script and when it is called. Probably somewhere via another script at a given point for each NixOS release.

I wrote it to follow the convention that I saw in other packages and the manual (including in that linked section), where no version specification is added to the Gemfile, since committing the lockfile pins the version anyway.

SuperSandro2000

Please update the package init commit to postrunner: init at 1.0.4.

nicknovitski · 2021-03-03T22:21:51Z

nixos/tests/postrunner.nix

A "test" like this can be implemented as an installCheck.

Sorry, but this is beyond my novice NixOS level.

As I understand, I should

Remove the file nixos/tests/postrunner.nix and

Add somehow a derivation of bundlerApp where I add some lines like

doInstallCheck = true; installCheckPhase = '' if [[ "$out/bin/postrunner --version)" == "postrunner version 1.0.4" ]]; then echo 'postrunner smoke check passed' else echo 'postrunner smoke check failed' return 1 fi '';

But I found no file under nixpks where a bundlerApp has a checkInstall. And I am not versed enough to make this happen.

Can you give me hint or a sketch of the solution?

Thanks in advance.

Alternately, you can use passthru.tests with runCommand helper, see https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#sec-package-tests

nixos-discourse · 2021-06-24T19:04:51Z

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/howto-run-a-postinstall-check-for-a-ruby-bundlerapp/13780/1

ngiger · 2021-06-25T14:48:11Z

Thanks jtojnar for your tipp. But I thinks these kind of tests work for python and haskell, but not for ruby gem packaged via bundlerEnv or bundlerApp.
And adding the lines

 passthru.doInstallCheck = true;
  passthru.installCheckPhase = ''
   echo doInstallCheck is true
  '';

Did not produce any output neither.

jtojnar · 2021-06-25T15:13:03Z

The point of passthru.tests is that they are run separately (e.g. nix-build -A postrunner.tests) our CI runs them.

stale · 2022-01-06T02:24:48Z

I marked this as stale due to inactivity. → More info

nixos-discourse · 2022-02-09T15:05:45Z

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/720

raboof · 2022-04-27T09:07:45Z

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 113317 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

postrunner

raboof

Looks good, one more thing to look at

raboof · 2022-04-27T09:10:19Z

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix

https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner#license looks like gpl2Only to me?

My understanding was, that with the GPL v2 you are entitled to use it also with a later version of the GPL. But I am not a license specialist.

But on github pkgs/tools/text/unoconv/default.nix which has licenses.gpl2 points to same license GPL v20 as the gpl2only marked in pkgs/tools/typesetting/htmldoc/default.nix.

And in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/lib/licenses.nix we have

gpl2Only = { spdxId = "GPL-2.0-only"; fullName = "GNU General Public License v2.0 only"; };

I do not find any mentioning of GPL-2.0-only in the postrunner code
.
So I am confused. Do you now how can get a definitive answer?

My understanding was, that with the GPL v2 you are entitled to use it also with a later version of the GPL. But I am not a license specialist.

If https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner/blob/master/lib/postrunner.rb#L8-L10 would mention or later. So gpl2Only is correct.

I do not find any mentioning of GPL-2.0-only in the postrunner code

Only is defined by the absence of or at your option any later version.

Do you now how can get a definitive answer?

I think the license text is pretty clear: https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner/blob/master/COPYING#L242

If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.

So AFAICS that confirms that, since they do specify 'version 2' but don't specify 'or any later version', we should interpret that as gpl2Only.

SuperSandro2000 · 2022-04-27T09:40:22Z

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix

Suggested change

homepage = "https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner.git";

homepage = "https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner";

raboof · 2022-04-27T11:54:07Z

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix

Suggested change

license = licenses.gpl2only;

license = licenses.gpl2Only;

raboof · 2022-05-02T12:19:48Z

As we don't squash on merge, perhaps the last 3 commits could be squashed into one postrunner: init at 1.0.5 commit?

raboof

Starting to look good, but postrunner version gives me:

ERROR: Permission denied @ rb_sysopen - /home/aengelen/.postrunner/html/icons/last.png
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1415:in `initialize'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1415:in `open'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1415:in `block in copy_file'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1414:in `open'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1414:in `copy_file'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1379:in `copy'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:497:in `block in copy_entry'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1513:in `wrap_traverse'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1516:in `block in wrap_traverse'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1515:in `each'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1515:in `wrap_traverse'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:494:in `copy_entry'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:468:in `block in cp_r'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1589:in `block in fu_each_src_dest'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1603:in `fu_each_src_dest0'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:1587:in `fu_each_src_dest'
/nix/store/55ywcfngxkymn252792i5mg6zd8glaqb-ruby-2.7.6/lib/ruby/2.7.0/fileutils.rb:467:in `cp_r'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/ActivitiesDB.rb:339:in `create_auxdir'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/ActivitiesDB.rb:83:in `block in create_directories'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/ActivitiesDB.rb:82:in `each'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/ActivitiesDB.rb:82:in `create_directories'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/ActivitiesDB.rb:36:in `initialize'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/Main.rb:646:in `new'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/Main.rb:646:in `import_legacy_archive'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/Main.rb:311:in `execute_command'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner/Main.rb:79:in `main'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner.rb:24:in `<module:PostRunner>'
/nix/store/l962hj6g01y4xp8n4hdzh7jih5y4pw5z-ruby2.7.6-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/lib/postrunner.rb:22:in `<top (required)>'
/nix/store/zgfbxq6bsvf35bx5870b3cizd9w8n4wl-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/bin/postrunner:4:in `require'
/nix/store/zgfbxq6bsvf35bx5870b3cizd9w8n4wl-postrunner-1.0.5/lib/ruby/gems/2.7.0/gems/postrunner-1.0.5/bin/postrunner:4:in `<top (required)>'
/nix/store/fp9xmpa031yf4agzv04kicdnlkp4nj7d-postrunner-1.0.5/bin/postrunner:35:in `load'
/nix/store/fp9xmpa031yf4agzv04kicdnlkp4nj7d-postrunner-1.0.5/bin/postrunner:35:in `<main>'

*******************************************************************************
You have triggered a bug in PostRunner 1.0.5!

That does not seem good?

This file was just created by postrunner itself:

-r--r--r-- 1 aengelen users 1.2K Jul 29 17:18 /home/aengelen/.postrunner/html/icons/last.png

ngiger · 2022-07-30T16:30:24Z

I cannot reproduce your problem. On my checkout I run

nix build -f default.nix pkgs.postrunner
result/bin/postrunner --version
1.0.5
result/bin/postrunner version
ERROR: Unknown command 'version'. See 'postrunner -h' for more information.

raboof · 2022-07-30T18:55:20Z

I cannot reproduce your problem. On my checkout I run
nix build -f default.nix pkgs.postrunner
result/bin/postrunner --version
1.0.5

That works for me as well

result/bin/postrunner version
ERROR: Unknown command 'version'. See 'postrunner -h' for more information.

This gives the Permission denied problem for me. I'm curious if nix-build -A postrunner.tests works for you - since that runs postrunner version it shouldn't succeed in this form, should it?

Anyway, since the documented behavior seems to work (and it's just the error reporting when using an invalid command that seems rather loud on my side) I guess this PR LGTM after fixing the test condition.

ngiger · 2022-07-31T00:29:21Z

Running the tests works for me as well:

nix-build -A postrunner.tests
this derivation will be built:
/nix/store/wcy1bz1bz8xq9cgbz3x9krm95cz26zqi-postrunner-1.0.5-tests.drv
building '/nix/store/wcy1bz1bz8xq9cgbz3x9krm95cz26zqi-postrunner-1.0.5-tests.drv'...
Usage postrunner <command> [options]
All test for postrunner-1.0.5-tests passed
/nix/store/9iasxdx9pv75ki2jcdly833xjmarn90v-postrunner-1.0.5-tests

I have nix (Nix) 2.8.1

raboof · 2022-07-31T10:14:18Z

Running the tests works for me as well:

Interesting - that is surprising since it does postrunner version instead of postrunner --version, right?

I have nix (Nix) 2.8.1

(I'm on 2.9.1, if that matters)

raboof · 2025-06-11T10:45:46Z

I tried rebasing this on nixos-unstable but now got:

html4_document.c: In function 'rb_html_document_s_read_io':
html4_document.c:49:52: error: passing argument 2 of 'xmlSetStructuredErrorFunc' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]

ngiger · 2025-06-12T10:24:25Z

@raboof: I think my old way to add the postrunner gem is too complicated.
I think following https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-frameworks/ruby.section.md it should be sufficient to add fit4ruby, perobs and postrunner into pkgs/top-level/ruby-packages.nix.
Then add postrunner in pkgs/development/ruby-modules/with-packages/Gemfile
This fails however as fit4ruby specifies bindata (~> 2.4.14), but nixpkgs has bindata 2.5.1.
I opened scrapper/fit4ruby#40 to fix this problem.
Once new versions of fit4ruby and postrunner are release, I will update this PR

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch 2 times, most recently from 3255898 to 55a3059 Compare February 16, 2021 17:38

SuperSandro2000 reviewed Feb 17, 2021

View reviewed changes

maintainers/maintainer-list.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from 55a3059 to d86f3cd Compare February 17, 2021 08:07

SuperSandro2000 requested changes Feb 18, 2021

View reviewed changes

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from d86f3cd to b3167d7 Compare February 18, 2021 07:22

SuperSandro2000 reviewed Feb 19, 2021

View reviewed changes

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch 2 times, most recently from 63a203d to 9847ceb Compare March 1, 2021 20:06

SuperSandro2000 reviewed Mar 3, 2021

View reviewed changes

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from 9847ceb to 7252cec Compare March 3, 2021 21:32

nicknovitski reviewed Mar 3, 2021

View reviewed changes

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from 7252cec to 4a230aa Compare June 25, 2021 15:59

github-actions bot removed the 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS label Jun 25, 2021

stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 6, 2022

maintainers: add ngiger

e79d9d6

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from 4a230aa to fe4d8d3 Compare February 5, 2022 10:51

stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Feb 5, 2022

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from fe4d8d3 to 098e94e Compare February 5, 2022 10:52

ngiger requested a review from SuperSandro2000 February 5, 2022 16:31

raboof reviewed Apr 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

SuperSandro2000 reviewed Apr 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

raboof reviewed Apr 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

pkgs/applications/misc/postrunner/default.nix Outdated

Copy link

Member

raboof Apr 27, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

license = licenses.gpl2only;

license = licenses.gpl2Only;

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from 576b0ed to f0521a6 Compare April 27, 2022 12:06

postrunner: init at 1.0.5

484cf05

ngiger force-pushed the postrunner branch from f0521a6 to 484cf05 Compare May 2, 2022 12:26

raboof reviewed Jul 29, 2022

View reviewed changes

ngiger requested a review from SuperSandro2000 July 31, 2022 00:30

wegank added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Mar 19, 2024

FliegendeWurst added the awaiting_changes label Dec 1, 2024

stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Dec 1, 2024

wegank added 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md labels Dec 31, 2024

SigmaSquadron removed the awaiting_changes label Jan 5, 2025

stale bot removed the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Jan 5, 2025

nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Dec 9, 2025

	homepage = "https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner.git";
	homepage = "https://github.com/scrapper/postrunner";

Uh oh!

Added ruby gem postrunner #113317

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Added ruby gem postrunner #113317

Uh oh!

Conversation

ngiger commented Feb 16, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Motivation for this change

Things done

Uh oh!

r-rmcgibbo commented Feb 16, 2021 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

SuperSandro2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ngiger commented Feb 18, 2021

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

SuperSandro2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nixos-discourse commented Jun 24, 2021

Uh oh!

ngiger commented Jun 25, 2021

Uh oh!

jtojnar commented Jun 25, 2021

Uh oh!

stale bot commented Jan 6, 2022

Uh oh!

nixos-discourse commented Feb 9, 2022

Uh oh!

raboof commented Apr 27, 2022

Uh oh!

raboof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

SuperSandro2000 Apr 27, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

raboof Apr 27, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

raboof commented May 2, 2022

Uh oh!

raboof left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ngiger commented Jul 30, 2022

Uh oh!

raboof commented Jul 30, 2022

Uh oh!

ngiger commented Jul 31, 2022

Uh oh!

ngiger commented Feb 16, 2021 •

edited

Loading

r-rmcgibbo commented Feb 16, 2021 •

edited

Loading

SuperSandro2000 Apr 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

raboof Apr 27, 2022 •

edited

Loading

raboof left a comment •

edited

Loading

raboof commented Jul 31, 2022 •

edited

Loading