Dev #5
Dev #5
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @abhishek-nexgen-dev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on reconfiguring the project for package publishing, specifically transitioning the package to a new organizational scope and setting up pnpm-specific configurations for dependency management and release processes. It introduces new configuration files and adjusts existing package metadata to streamline future releases.
Highlights
- Package Identity and Versioning: The package name in
package.jsonhas been updated from@abhishek-nexgen-dev/fastkitto@nexgenstudiodev/fastkit, indicating a transition to a new organizational scope. Additionally, the package version has been reset from1.0.1to1.0.0. - PNPM Configuration Setup: New configuration files,
.npmrcand.pnpmfile.mjs, have been added. These files configurepnpm's behavior for package management and publishing, including registry settings, authentication, and various dependency resolution options likeshamefullyHoist,strictPeerDependencies,nodeLinker, andpublishBranch. - Publishing Workflow Adjustments: The
publish:pnpmscript inpackage.jsonhas been modified to include the--no-git-checksflag, aligning with thegitChecks: falsesetting introduced in.pnpmfile.mjs. This change streamlines the publishing process by bypassing Git checks. - NPM Ignore List Modifications: The
.npmignorefile has been updated to no longer exclude test-related directories (__tests__/,test/,tests/) and.envfiles from the published package. This means these files will now be included in the distributed package.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates project configuration, including changing the package name, resetting the version, and adding configuration for npm and pnpm. The review identified a critical syntax error in package.json that makes it invalid, and a security vulnerability in .npmignore that could expose sensitive .env files. A high severity recommendation was made to improve publishing safety. Please address the critical issues before merging.
package.json
Outdated
| "prepublishOnly": "npm run format && npm run lint && npm run build", | ||
| "publish:npm": "npm publish --access public", | ||
| "publish:pnpm": "pnpm publish --access public", | ||
| "publish:npm": "npm publish --access public", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line has a leading space, which makes the package.json file invalid JSON. This will cause parsing errors for package managers and other tools. Please remove the leading space.
"publish:npm": "npm publish --access public",
.pnpmfile.mjs
Outdated
| preferWorkspacePackages: true, | ||
| sharedWorkspaceLockfile: true, | ||
| publishBranch: 'master', | ||
| gitChecks: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Disabling gitChecks globally is risky as it allows publishing from a dirty working directory, which could lead to uncommitted or experimental code being published accidentally. It's safer to keep this enabled by default and use the --no-git-checks flag for specific commands when necessary, as you've done in package.json.
gitChecks: true,
No description provided.