Implementation of additional systematic uncertainty in EIC data #2069
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Do we want to do the same for EICc @Radonirinaunimi @enocera ? |
Member
Thanks @toonhasenack and @giacomomagni for this! Could we have a theory vs data comparison here? As mentioned that'll provide us information on whether this normalization is sufficient. If that is not the case, we should not do the same for EIcC. |
2 tasks
Member
|
@toonhasenack, this has now be moved here #2094. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding flat systematic uncertainties for EIC
g1_charm.The value is provided by Yuxiang.