Sr 03h

[rachellerathbone]

What

Brief description of changes

Why

Why this change was needed

How

Brief technical approach

Testing

How to verify the changes

[github-actions]

multicorn-ops review

Persona	Role	Primary	Status	Summary
Jordan	Security Auditor	yes	Passed	No security-relevant changes; this is purely a UI prompt text and test fixture rename.
Priya	Open Source Contributor	yes	Concern	The prompt label rename from 'MCP server command' to 'Shield govern' is not intuitive and the test key strings are now brand-specific jargon that new contributors will find confusing.
Marcus	Design-Conscious Developer	no	Passed	No UI rendering changes in scope for this diff.
Sarah	Non-Technical Decision-Maker	no	Concern	'Shield govern' is unexplained jargon that would confuse a non-technical user trying to set up their first agent.
The Team	Acquisition Due Diligence	yes	Concern	Prompt-string matching in tests is a brittle pattern that creates implicit coupling between CLI copy and test logic, signaling tech debt.
Alex	Accessibility Advocate	no	Passed	No HTML or interactive UI changes in this diff; accessibility not impacted.
Yuki	International User	yes	Concern	The new prompt is clearer than before but 'Shield govern' is a brand-specific phrase that is not plain English and may not be understandable to non-native speakers.

Concerns

Priya (Open Source Contributor)

• src/proxy/__tests__/proxy.edge-cases.test.ts:736 - 'Shield govern' as a test prompt key is cryptic — it looks like a product name collision rather than a descriptive label. If the prompt text changes again, every test fixture breaks. Consider matching the full prompt substring more robustly or using a named constant.
• src/proxy/config.ts:624 - The new multi-line prompt text is not covered by a corresponding update to the test matcher — tests still match on 'Shield govern' but the actual prompt no longer contains only that phrase, making the coupling fragile for future contributors.

Sarah (Non-Technical Decision-Maker)

• src/proxy/config.ts:624 - The phrase 'What MCP server should Shield govern' assumes the user knows what 'Shield govern' means and what an MCP server is. The old phrasing was clearer about the action being taken. Consider plain language like 'What command starts the server this agent will connect to?'

The Team (Acquisition Due Diligence)

• src/proxy/__tests__/proxy.edge-cases.test.ts:736 - Tests match on raw substrings of the prompt text (e.g. 'Shield govern'). Any copy change breaks many tests simultaneously. A constant or enum for prompt identifiers should be extracted and shared between config.ts and tests to reduce this coupling.
• src/proxy/config.ts:624 - The prompt string was expanded to multiple lines/sentences but tests still match only on 'Shield govern' — the subset match happens to work today but is invisible as a contract. No comment or constant documents the dependency.

Yuki (International User)

• src/proxy/config.ts:624 - 'What MCP server should Shield govern for this agent?' — 'govern' is an unusual verb in this technical context and may not map cleanly to non-English mental models. A simpler phrasing like 'Which MCP server command should Shield manage for this agent?' is more actionable and easier to translate.

Open-Source Readiness Checklist

Code Quality

• All functions have clear, descriptive names — No new functions introduced; existing function runInit is descriptive.
• No hardcoded secrets, API keys, internal URLs, or employee names in code or comments — The URL 'https://api.multicorn.ai' was already present; no new secrets or internal URLs introduced.
• [~] No // TODO without a public issue reference — No TODOs added or visible in the diff.
• No commented-out code blocks — No commented-out code blocks introduced.
• No debug logging (console.log, println) left in — No debug logging introduced.
• [~] All any types eliminated (TypeScript) — No new TypeScript type annotations added or removed in the diff.
• [~] Error handling is complete — no swallowed exceptions, no empty catch blocks — Diff is limited to string changes; error handling not affected.
• No Atlassian-internal references, no proprietary patterns or terminology — 'Shield govern' appears to be a product-specific or internal terminology (possibly branded). If 'Shield' is a proprietary/internal product name it may be an internal reference. This warrants review.

Testing

• All new code has tests — Tests are updated in parallel with the prompt string change in config.ts.
• [~] Coverage meets or exceeds repo minimum — Coverage metrics cannot be determined from the diff alone.
• [~] Tests pass locally and in CI — CI status not visible in the diff.
• Edge cases and error paths are tested — Existing edge-case tests are updated to match the new prompt string.
• [~] No flaky tests — Cannot determine flakiness from the diff.

Security

• No secrets in code, comments, config files, or git history — No secrets introduced.
• [~] All user input is validated — Input validation logic is not changed by this diff.
• [~] Dependencies audited — no known vulnerabilities — No dependency changes in the diff.
• HTTPS enforced for all external communication — Existing HTTPS URL retained; no new HTTP URLs introduced.
• API keys/tokens never logged — No logging of keys/tokens added.

Documentation

• README.md is accurate and up to date — The user-facing prompt text changed (MCP server command → Shield govern wording) but no README update is visible in the diff.
• [~] CONTRIBUTING.md is accurate and up to date — CONTRIBUTING.md not touched; unclear if it references the old prompt.
• CHANGELOG.md updated with this change — No CHANGELOG update is visible in the diff.
• [~] New public APIs have JSDoc/KDoc with examples — No new public APIs introduced.
• [~] Any new config options are documented — No new config options introduced; this is a prompt text change only.
• [~] Architecture decisions documented in ADR if significant — Change is a minor prompt text update; no architecture decision required.

Open Source Hygiene

• [~] Licence header present in source files (if required by licence) — Cannot determine licence header requirements from the diff.
• [~] CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md present — Not verifiable from the diff.
• [~] Issue templates are current — Not verifiable from the diff.
• [~] PR template is current — Not verifiable from the diff.
• No internal company references or links — 'Shield' in 'Shield govern' may be a proprietary product name. If it is an internal Atlassian or company-specific product, this could be an internal reference embedded in the open-source codebase.
• [~] Package name and description are correct in package.json — package.json not modified in the diff.
• [~] Repository topics/tags are set on GitHub — Cannot determine from the diff.

---

Advisory only. Does not block merge. Actions logged to Shield as pr_review and oss_check.