Skip to content

Comments

Clarify application acceleration details#128214

Open
ravisha22 wants to merge 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
ravisha22:patch-2
Open

Clarify application acceleration details#128214
ravisha22 wants to merge 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
ravisha22:patch-2

Conversation

@ravisha22
Copy link

Updated the description of application acceleration to specify unicast network routing instead of anycast, inline with the platform changes being made.

Updated the description of application acceleration to specify unicast network routing instead of anycast, inline with the platform changes being made.
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@ravisha22 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 927fc02:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/networking/load-balancer-content-delivery/load-balancing-content-delivery-overview.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@ttorble ttorble requested a review from Copilot February 19, 2026 15:56
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the documentation for Azure's load balancing and content delivery services to clarify that application acceleration uses unicast network routing instead of anycast network, aligning with current platform capabilities.

Changes:

  • Updated the application acceleration description to specify unicast network routing instead of anycast network

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@ttorble
Copy link
Contributor

ttorble commented Feb 19, 2026

@ravisha22 - This pull request was opened in the public repo. PMs should work in the private repo, per the Microsoft Docs contributor guide. We can keep this PR open for review and merge, but would you make future content updates in the private repo? Thank you!

@mbender-ms

Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Feb 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants