Example experiment using the density following adjoint feature#51
Open
ciarapimm wants to merge 9 commits intoMITgcm:masterfrom
Open
Example experiment using the density following adjoint feature#51ciarapimm wants to merge 9 commits intoMITgcm:masterfrom
ciarapimm wants to merge 9 commits intoMITgcm:masterfrom
Conversation
ciarapimm
changed the title
Member
|
@ciarapimm I looked at the changes here and I think this would be a nice addition to this "secondary" test |
Member
|
OK, it turns out that this addition to "data.ecco" does not affect the results at all (no changes in |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds changes to data.ecco to have a 4th gencost contribution. This gencost contribution is an example experiment of using a density following adjoint feature, seen in pull request: Changes to add density following adjoint feature
MITgcm/MITgcm#484