Update git.ts #2
Conversation
![jit-ci[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/142441?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| function bad1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | |
| el.textContent = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| function bad2(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; | |
| document.body.textContent = userInput; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 14 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
|
|
||
| function bad1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | |
| el.textContent = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
|
|
||
| function bad2(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; | |
| document.body.textContent = userInput; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 14 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
Until now, you ignored/fixed 14 findings.
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
|
|
||
| function bad1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | |
| el.textContent = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| function bad2(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; | |
| document.body.textContent = userInput; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 14 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
Until now, you ignored/fixed 28 findings.
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| function bad3(userInput) { | ||
| const name = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.write(name); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write(name); | |
| console.log(name); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
|
|
||
| function bad1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| el.innerHTML = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; | |
| el.textContent = '<div>' + userInput + '</div>'; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>"+document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=")+8)+"</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| function bad2(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: insecure-document-method | ||
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.body.outerHTML = userInput; | |
| document.body.textContent = userInput; |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| // ruleid:dom-based-xss |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 14 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
Until now, you ignored/fixed 29 findings.
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 14 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
Until now, you ignored/fixed 30 findings.
extensions/git/src/git.ts
Outdated
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: [userInput, "hello"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 1057 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
Until now, you ignored/fixed 44 findings.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| console.log("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| console.log("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Dom-Based-Xss.Dom-Based-Xss
Description: Detected possible DOM-based XSS. This occurs because a portion of the URL is being used to construct an element added directly to the page. For example, a malicious actor could send someone a link like this: http://www.some.site/page.html?default=<script>alert(document.cookie)</script> which would add the script to the page. Consider allowlisting appropriate values or using an approach which does not involve the URL.
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation will replace usage of 'document.location.href' within 'document.write()' with a safe alternative. Using 'document.location.href' in this manner can lead to DOM-Based XSS attacks, hence replacing it with a safer alternative will help prevent such attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write('Safe alternative content'); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.dom-based-xss.dom-based-xss" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | ||
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Browser.Security.Insecure-Document-Method.Insecure-Document-Method
Description: User controlled data in methods like innerHTML, outerHTML or document.write is an anti-pattern that can lead to XSS vulnerabilities
Severity: HIGH
Fix suggestion:
This fix suggestion was generated by Jit. Please note that the suggestion might not always fit every use case. It is highly recommended that you check and review it before merging.
Suggestion guidelines
This remediation replaces the usage of insecure methods like 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML' or 'document.write' with a safer alternative, 'textContent'. The code will now use 'textContent' to safely set or update the content without putting your application at risk of XSS attacks.
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| document.write("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); | |
| console.log("<OPTION value=1>" + document.location.href.substring(document.location.href.indexOf("default=") + 8) + "</OPTION>"); |
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.browser.security.insecure-document-method.insecure-document-method" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| async function test1(userInput) { | ||
| // ruleid: deno-dangerous-run | ||
| const p = Deno.run({ | ||
| cmd: ["bash", "-c", userInput], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Static Code Analysis Js
Type: Javascript.Deno.Security.Audit.Deno-Dangerous-Run.Deno-Dangerous-Run
Description: Detected non-literal calls to Deno.run(). This could lead to a command injection vulnerability.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "javascript.deno.security.audit.deno-dangerous-run.deno-dangerous-run" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ The following Jit checks failed to run:
- secret-detection
#jit_bypass_commit in this PR to bypass, Jit Admin privileges required.
More info in the Jit platform.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 270 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Jit has detected 123 important findings in this PR that you should review.
The first 10 findings are detailed below as separate comments.
Click here to view all the findings on Jit.
It’s highly recommended that you fix these security issues before merging.
Alternatively, comment #jit_ignore_all in this PR to ignore all findings. Admin privileges required.
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in extensions/git/src/git.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_TWO = 'AKIASLEPEFMTEF3JEWSP' | ||
| const AWS_KEY_ONE = 'AKIAIWSXFHRM7F6Z3NWQ' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security control: Secret Detection
Type: Aws-Access-Token
Description: Identified a pattern that may indicate AWS credentials, risking unauthorized cloud resource access and data breaches on AWS platforms.
Severity: HIGH
Jit Bot commands and options (e.g., ignore issue)
You can trigger Jit actions by commenting on this PR review:
#jit_ignore_fpIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “False Positive”#jit_ignore_acceptIgnore and mark this specific single instance of finding as “Accept Risk”#jit_ignore_type_in_fileIgnore any finding of type "aws-access-token" in src/vs/workbench/contrib/notebook/browser/view/renderers/webviewPreloads.ts; future occurrences will also be ignored.#jit_undo_ignoreUndo ignore command
No description provided.