-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
feat: batch cold account loads in light client #2341
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sergeytimoshin
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
sergey/load-accounts-batching
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ce73e21
feat: optimize address batch pipeline
sergeytimoshin d0e4697
format
sergeytimoshin 4650c0a
feat: stabilize address batch pipeline
sergeytimoshin ed44b77
feat: batch cold account loads in light client
sergeytimoshin f9a788c
fix: harden load batching and mixed decompression
sergeytimoshin 7ab1c90
Fix prover startup and decompression load flow
sergeytimoshin 588127c
cleanup: harden prover startup polling
sergeytimoshin badacfa
format
sergeytimoshin c65e87b
format
sergeytimoshin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bind the hash-chain cursor to the requested batch.
get_batch_snapshotstill trusts two independent caller-controlled cursors:start..endandhashchain_idx. That lets a caller build a non-batch-sized snapshot or accidentally pair batch N's addresses/proofs with batch M's hash chain, which only fails later during proof generation/verification. This helper already knowsself.zkp_batch_size, so it should enforce one aligned batch here and derive or validate the hash-chain index locally.🩹 Suggested guardrails
pub fn get_batch_snapshot<const HEIGHT: usize>( &self, start: usize, end: usize, hashchain_idx: usize, ) -> crate::Result<Option<AddressBatchSnapshot<HEIGHT>>> { + if start >= end { + return Ok(None); + } + + let batch_len = end - start; + if batch_len != self.zkp_batch_size || start % self.zkp_batch_size != 0 { + return Err(anyhow!( + "invalid address batch range {}..{} for zkp_batch_size {}", + start, + end, + self.zkp_batch_size + )); + } + + let expected_hashchain_idx = start / self.zkp_batch_size; + if hashchain_idx != expected_hashchain_idx { + return Err(anyhow!( + "hashchain_idx {} does not match batch range {}..{} (expected {})", + hashchain_idx, + start, + end, + expected_hashchain_idx + )); + } + let available = self.wait_for_batch(end); - if available < end || start >= end { + if available < end { return Ok(None); }Based on learnings: ZKP batch sizes for address trees must be 10 or 250, and tree updates must require zero-knowledge proofs with public inputs: old root, new root, hash chain, and next_index.
Also applies to: 524-541
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents