Skip to content

Fix formatting in _meta.json by correcting indentation for the "docs"…#469

Open
vrijraj wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dev
Open

Fix formatting in _meta.json by correcting indentation for the "docs"…#469
vrijraj wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dev

Conversation

@vrijraj
Copy link
Contributor

@vrijraj vrijraj commented Feb 13, 2026

… section to ensure proper JSON structure.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Minor formatting adjustment to configuration files.

Note: This release contains only maintenance updates with no user-facing changes.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 13, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
site Error Error Feb 13, 2026 5:00pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pages/_meta.json file's indentation was adjusted for the "docs" key within the top-level JSON object. This is a formatting change with no structural, semantic, or functional impact.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Formatting
pages/_meta.json
Indentation adjustment for the "docs" key; formatting change only, no structural or semantic impact.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, a tiny space,
The JSON docs now finds its place,
Indented just so, neat and tight,
Our config whiskers feel so right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing formatting in _meta.json by correcting indentation for the 'docs' key, which aligns directly with the file changes shown in the summary.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant