Skip to content

Tweaks to the epsilon suggested by Codex#177

Open
adamchalmers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
achalmers/numeric-tweaks
Open

Tweaks to the epsilon suggested by Codex#177
adamchalmers wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
achalmers/numeric-tweaks

Conversation

@adamchalmers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.79%. Comparing base (9294b99) to head (71360b5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #177   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.78%   92.79%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        3897     3898    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         3616     3617    +1     
  Misses        281      281           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.79% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 12, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #177 will not alter performance

Comparing achalmers/numeric-tweaks (71360b5) with main (9294b99)

Summary

✅ 9 untouched
⏩ 5 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 5 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@adamchalmers adamchalmers force-pushed the achalmers/numeric-tweaks branch from 23e12d9 to 71360b5 Compare December 12, 2025 05:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant