sort name of fields/toplevel objects in generated codes#30
Merged
Conversation
so the generated code is (more) deterministic and collaborators won’t be generating insane diffs when their python version or gel server decides to return values in another order. don’t sort args/kwargs and NamedTuple fields as it breaks existing code (and I’m hoping that in this case the order is correctly maintained.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
so the generated code is (more) deterministic and collaborators won’t be generating insane diffs when their python version or gel server decides to return values in another order.
don’t sort args/kwargs and NamedTuple fields as it breaks existing code (and I’m hoping that in this case the order is correctly maintained.
seems to work without issue in nanapi