Skip to content

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link

Add comprehensive unit tests for invoice API endpoints

Summary

This PR adds a comprehensive test suite for all invoice API endpoints in the backend, addressing the lack of test coverage for the frontend API client layer. The new test_invoices_api.py file includes 24 unit tests that cover all CRUD operations for invoice management.

Key additions:

  • Tests for all 5 invoice API endpoints: GET /api/invoices/, GET /api/invoices/{id}, POST /api/invoices/, PUT /api/invoices/{id}, DELETE /api/invoices/{id}
  • Comprehensive coverage of success scenarios, error handling, authentication, and user isolation
  • Uses in-memory SQLite for isolated testing with proper Flask app context management
  • Follows existing test patterns from test_jwt.py

Test coverage includes:

  • ✅ JWT authentication requirements for all endpoints
  • ✅ Input validation (required fields, data types, format validation)
  • ✅ User isolation (users can only access their own invoices)
  • ✅ Error scenarios (404, 400, 401, 500 status codes)
  • ✅ Database operations with proper rollback handling
  • ✅ Invoice item management and total calculations

All 31 tests now pass (24 new + 7 existing JWT tests).

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

  • Run tests locally - Execute python3 src/backend/tests/run_tests.py and python3 src/backend/tests/test_invoices_api.py to verify all tests pass consistently
  • Review test scenarios against business requirements - Check that the test cases cover actual user workflows and edge cases that matter in production
  • Verify JWT authentication handling - Ensure the JWT token creation in tests matches the real authentication flow used in the application
  • Test database isolation - Run individual tests multiple times to ensure no state leakage or race conditions between test methods
  • Validate test data realism - Review sample invoice data, date formats, and edge cases to ensure they reflect real-world usage patterns

Recommended test plan: After code review, run the full test suite locally, then test the actual invoice API endpoints manually with a tool like Postman to verify the tests accurately represent the real API behavior.


Diagram

%%{ init : { "theme" : "default" }}%%
graph TD
    A["src/backend/tests/test_invoices_api.py"]:::major-edit
    B["src/backend/routes/invoices.py"]:::context
    C["src/backend/models.py"]:::context
    D["src/backend/tests/test_jwt.py"]:::context
    E["src/backend/tests/run_tests.py"]:::context
    F["src/frontend/src/utils/api.js"]:::context

    A -->|"Tests all endpoints"| B
    A -->|"Uses Invoice & InvoiceItem models"| C
    A -->|"Follows same pattern"| D
    E -->|"Auto-discovers"| A
    F -->|"invoicesAPI methods tested"| A

    subgraph Legend
        L1[Major Edit]:::major-edit
        L2[Minor Edit]:::minor-edit
        L3[Context/No Edit]:::context
    end

    classDef major-edit fill:#90EE90
    classDef minor-edit fill:#87CEEB
    classDef context fill:#FFFFFF
Loading

Notes

  • The tests use the same Flask app setup pattern as existing JWT tests, ensuring consistency
  • Fixed SQLAlchemy deprecation warnings by using db.session.get() instead of Query.get()
  • Generated unique invoice numbers using timestamps and UUIDs to avoid constraint violations
  • All tests run in isolated in-memory SQLite databases that are created/destroyed for each test method

Session Info: Requested by @JRWu (jia.wu@codeium.com)
Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/02a3f281c63e47af88674cdb2a997b11

- Test all CRUD operations (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
- Cover success scenarios and error handling
- Test authentication requirements for all endpoints
- Test input validation and edge cases
- Test user isolation (users can only access their own invoices)
- Follow existing test patterns and conventions
- Use in-memory SQLite for isolated testing
- All 24 tests pass successfully

Co-Authored-By: jia.wu@codeium.com <jia_wu@hotmail.ca>
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant