Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request does a great job of restructuring the agent instructions by splitting them into project-specific context and general workflow playbooks. The addition of the PR Consolidation Playbook is a valuable enhancement. The overall changes significantly improve the clarity and organization of the document. I have one minor suggestion to improve the clarity of a command in the new consolidation playbook.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/copilot-instructions.md:
- Around line 213-220: Add a prominent one-line "Reference-only" warning at the
top of the "Part 2: General Agent Workflow Playbooks" section to make it obvious
this content is not intended as permanent repo policy; update the heading block
in .github/copilot-instructions.md (the "Part 2: General Agent Workflow
Playbooks" section) to prepend a short, bold or all-caps notice like
"REFERENCE-ONLY: Do not merge into main as a policy" and ensure the existing
paragraph about marking reference PRs remains unchanged and clearly referenced
from that warning.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c1699caa-3c5e-4ffb-8d28-375596cf4cec
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/copilot-instructions.md
DO NOT MERGE TO MAIN
This is a reference-only PR for instruction wording. Keep it out of
mainunless we later decide to adopt this split and workflow wording intentionally.What changed
.github/copilot-instructions.mdinto two explicit halves:PR Consolidation Playbooksection covering:sleep 300 && gh pr checks "$PR_URL"loop after every destination-branch pushmainby defaultWhy this is separate
The repository-specific facts are useful in
main, but the generalized workflow playbook is broader and should be reviewed as a reference pattern first.