-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
docs: reorganize threading and branch filtering sections #92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Move implemented threading sections into new "Threading & Branch Filtering" section - Add "PR Comment Branch Filtering" section (in-memory cache approach) - Add "Base Branch Change (Retarget) Handling" for retroactive anchor creation - Update table references: event_threads → messageMappings - Update "Remaining Work" checklist with current status - Remove obsolete SQL snippets, keep implementation details concise 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WalkthroughThis PR updates GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md to formalize and expand architectural documentation. It introduces new structured sections for Branch-Specific Event Filtering and Thread-Based Event Grouping, including syntax specifications, data models, and implementation guidance. The PR reorganizes previous brainstorm content into concrete implementation details, updates configuration examples, and adjusts implementation status indicators to reflect completed work and revised priorities. Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md (2)
432-443: Add language identifier to fenced code block.The "Event Processing Flow" code block should declare its language for proper syntax highlighting and linting compliance.
2. **Event Processing Flow:** -``` +```text Incoming webhook event ↓ Is this a PR/issue event?
507-519: Use markdown heading instead of emphasis for section title.Convert the emphasis formatting to a proper markdown heading for consistent document structure.
-**Solution: In-memory PR Branch Cache** +### Solution: In-memory PR Branch Cache
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
[uncategorized] ~389-~389: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...orage:** New branch_filter column in github_subscriptions: - NULL = default bra...
(GITHUB)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
433-433: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
507-507: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
GITHUB_APP_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md (2)
355-585: Threading & Branch Filtering section is comprehensive and well-integrated.The new sections are clearly structured, technically sound, and align with PR objectives. Key strengths:
- Branch-Specific Event Filtering: Clear syntax, thorough scope table, design decisions justified, migration impact noted
- Thread-Based Event Grouping: Comprehensive data model, detailed event flow, practical edge cases covered, configuration options explicit
- PR Comment Branch Filtering: Smart cache strategy with API fallback documented
- PR Anchor Dynamic Updates: Well-thought-out anchor refresh logic, base branch retargeting handled, webhook ordering considerations included
- messageMappings consistently referenced (no stale event_threads references)
- Breaking change (default branch-only) explicitly called out at lines 402–405
The content strikes a good balance between implementation detail and conciseness.
641-644: Remaining Work section properly reflects implementation status.The checklist correctly marks completed items (thread-based grouping, PR anchor updates) and pending items (PR comment branch filtering, retroactive anchor creation). Status accurately reflects the new section content.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.