Skip to content

HR-Freak/A-B-Testing

Repository files navigation

Vanguard A/B Testing Analysis

UI Redesign Experiment for Conversion Optimisation

Author: Marisa Oliveira Project Type: Data Analytics / A/B Testing Year: 2026

Developed as part of a group project. My contribution focused on data cleaning, exploratory analysis, KPI design, and statistical testing.


🚀 Key Results

  • Increased completion rate from 49.9% → 58.6% (+8.7pp lift)

  • Confirmed statistical significance (p-value < 0.05)

  • Identified increased friction despite higher conversion:

    • Backtracks: 0.30 → 0.44
    • Error rate: 8.8% → 11.6%
  • Demonstrated that improved UX can increase conversion while introducing cognitive load


📌 Project Overview

This project evaluates a digital A/B test conducted by Vanguard to determine whether a redesigned user interface improves the completion rate of an online investment process.

The redesigned UI introduced in-context prompts (hints, cues, guidance) aimed at improving usability and increasing successful task completion.


🧠 Business Context

The experiment was designed to improve digital adoption and increase successful investment actions, a key driver of assets under management (AUM).

The core question:

Does a more intuitive interface lead to higher completion rates?


🧪 Experiment Design

  • Control Group: Traditional interface
  • Test Group: Modern UI with in-context prompts
  • Funnel Steps: start → step_1 → step_2 → step_3 → confirm

📊 Key Metrics

  • Completion Rate (Primary KPI)
  • Backtracks (user friction indicator)
  • Error Rate (non-linear navigation)
  • Session Duration

📈 Key Insights

Conversion Impact

The redesigned UI significantly improved completion rates:

  • Control: ~49.9%
  • Test: ~58.6%

This represents a meaningful uplift in conversion.


Friction Trade-off

Despite higher conversion:

  • Users in the Test group showed more backtracking
  • Error rates increased
  • Time spent on the final step increased significantly

👉 Insight: Improved UX does not always mean reduced friction — users may engage more deeply or double-check decisions.


Statistical Validation

A Z-test for proportions confirmed that the uplift in completion rate is statistically significant:

  • p-value < 0.05
  • Reject null hypothesis
  • UI redesign is likely the driver of improvement

💰 Business Impact

  • Conversion uplift exceeded the 5% threshold required for rollout
  • Enables higher AUM through increased successful transactions
  • Provides evidence-based justification for UI redesign

🧩 Challenges & Approach

Data Challenges

  • Converting non-linear clickstream data into a structured funnel
  • Detecting backtracking behaviour
  • Cleaning timestamps to measure true session duration

Analytical Approach

  • Funnel reconstruction from event logs
  • Feature engineering for behavioural metrics
  • Hypothesis testing using statistical methods

🎯 Recommendations

  • Roll out the new UI based on conversion uplift
  • Optimise the confirm step to reduce friction and time spent
  • Continue monitoring long-term customer value (AUM, retention)

🛠 Tools & Technologies

  • Python (Pandas, NumPy, SciPy)
  • Tableau (visualisation)
  • Jupyter Notebook
  • Git & GitHub

📁 Project Structure

  • Data cleaning & exploration notebook
  • Experiment analysis notebook
  • Processed datasets
  • Documentation

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors