Conversation
Author
|
Implemented in v4.0.79 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Mikko,
I just found that SecuritySetup does not contain description for Certificates.
I also added missing enum values for GSMPacketSwitchStatus, which I was also suggesting in last PullRequest, but I think you missed that: #36 (comment) and #36 (comment)
With suggestion about commenting enum values: I think, that in this case, the use of comment is redundant. It is much more readable, when I can see all the enums without the use of comments, that say the same thing as the enum name itself.