Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 10, 2025

Generated security analysis identifying all entities accessible if Alberto Polak's account is compromised.

Changes

  • Blast Radius Report (alberto-polak-blast-radius-report.md)
    • Queried Microsoft Security Graph for entities with walkable paths from Alberto Polak
    • Identified 33 Azure Key Vaults across 16 resource groups with direct access
    • Ranked entities by risk level (Critical → Moderate) based on:
      • Production environment indicators
      • Critical workload types (AI, MDC, Sentinel, identity services)
      • Security infrastructure (firewall certs, TLS inspection)
      • Sensitive data systems (payroll, authentication)
    • Documented attack paths and impact scope
    • Provided prioritized remediation recommendations (immediate/short-term/long-term)

Key Findings

High blast radius: Single compromised credential exposes production deployments, security monitoring infrastructure, AI services, and identity management systems.

Attack surface includes:

  • 6 critical resources (prod env, firewall certs, TLS inspection, Sentinel)
  • 9 high-risk resources (AI hubs, MDC, Arc security, core identity)
  • 10 medium-risk resources (automation, payroll, SAP integration)
  • 8 moderate-risk resources (dev/test environments)

All entities accessible via single hop—no privilege escalation required.

Original prompt

You need to find the what is the blast radius of 'Alberto Polak', then write me a report based on the results you got. The report should be in md format and rank the related entities based on their risk level.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: GuoyuHao <9014236+GuoyuHao@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Find blast radius of Alberto Polak and report results Add blast radius security analysis report for Alberto Polak Dec 10, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from GuoyuHao December 10, 2025 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants