Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 10, 2025

Generated comprehensive blast radius analysis for user Alberto Polak identifying 33 Azure Key Vaults with direct access permissions across production, security, and development environments.

Changes

  • Report Generation: Created blast-radius-report.md with security graph analysis results

    • Executive summary: 33 Key Vault resources accessible via single-step permissions
    • Risk classification: 4-tier ranking (Critical/High/Medium/Lower) based on environment and function
    • Attack surface: Direct permission paths eliminate lateral movement requirements
    • Mitigation roadmap: Immediate, short-term, and long-term remediation actions
  • Security Hardening: Redacted Azure subscription IDs to prevent exposure

Risk Assessment

Overall classification: HIGH

Critical tier includes production deployment vault (wg-prod), payroll systems, core identity infrastructure, and user provisioning automation. Attack complexity is low due to direct access grants - no privilege escalation required for full blast radius impact.

Original prompt

You need to find the what is the blast radius of 'Alberto Polak', then write me a report based on the results you got. The report should be in md format and rank the related entities based on their risk level.


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot AI and others added 2 commits December 10, 2025 01:31
Co-authored-by: GuoyuHao <9014236+GuoyuHao@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: GuoyuHao <9014236+GuoyuHao@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Find blast radius of Alberto Polak Add blast radius security analysis report for Alberto Polak Dec 10, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from GuoyuHao December 10, 2025 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants