This is a test PR for Reward test 3 #146

[MenaSebas]

#146

Pull Request | GrantChain

1. Issue Link

• Closes #(issue number)

---

2. Brief Description of the Issue

---

3. Type of Change

Mark with an x all the checkboxes that apply (like [x]).

• 📝 Documentation (updates to README, docs, or comments)
• 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• 👌 Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

---

4. Changes Made

• Change 1
• Change 2
• Change 3

---

5. Evidence Before Solution

Loom Video - Before Solution

---

6. Evidence After Solution

Loom Video - After Solution

---

7. Important Notes

• Note 1
• Note 2
• Note 3

If you don't use this template, you'd be ignored

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated environment configuration example file.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .env.example configuration file was modified to comment out the NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY variable and add a comment line. This deactivates the example key entry without removing it from the file, reducing the active configuration surface for this example environment template.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration \.env\.example	Commented out NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY= line; added comment #titolodiesempionumerotrentatre (+3/-1)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A key once lived in .env so bright,
Now commented out, no longer in sight,
A cryptic note takes its place with care,
Config evolves, lightweight and fair! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description uses the template structure but leaves most sections as placeholders with no actual details filled in: no real issue link, empty brief description, no type of change selected, generic bullet points unchanged, placeholder video links, and generic notes.	Complete all required template sections with actual information: provide real issue link, describe what was changed and why, select appropriate change type, remove placeholder text, and add relevant notes if needed.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title mentions a test PR and references issue #146, but it is vague and does not clearly describe the actual change made (commenting out API key in .env.example).	Revise the title to clearly describe the primary change, such as 'Comment out NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY in .env.example' instead of generic 'test PR' phrasing.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In @.env.example:
- Around line 22-24: Remove the nonsensical placeholder comment and either
delete the line or replace it with a meaningful comment describing
NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY (e.g., what the key is for and where to obtain it)
and ensure the NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY= line remains as the sample variable;
also add a trailing newline at the end of the .env.example file to satisfy
linting.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 066f95f and d603404.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .env.example

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: CR
Repo: GrantChain/GrantFox PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/posthog-integration.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T01:46:15.361Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx} : Never hallucinate an API key. Instead, always use the API key populated in the .env file.

📚 Learning: 2025-07-22T01:46:15.361Z

Learnt from: CR
Repo: GrantChain/GrantFox PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/posthog-integration.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T01:46:15.361Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx} : Never hallucinate an API key. Instead, always use the API key populated in the .env file.

Applied to files:

• .env.example

🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)

.env.example

[warning] 24-24: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file

(EndingBlankLine)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove or replace the nonsensical comment line.

Line 24 contains #titolodiesempionumerotrentatre, which appears to be placeholder or test text rather than meaningful documentation. This should either be removed entirely or replaced with a descriptive comment explaining the Resend API key configuration.

✨ Suggested fix

# RESEND API KEY FOR EMAILS
-#NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
-
-#titolodiesempionumerotrentatre
+# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=

Additionally, add a blank line at the end of the file to comply with linting standards.

-#titolodiesempionumerotrentatre
+#titolodiesempionumerotrentatre
+

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	#NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
	#titolodiesempionumerotrentatre
	#NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
	#titolodiesempionumerotrentatre

🧰 Tools

🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)

[warning] 24-24: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file

(EndingBlankLine)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In @.env.example around lines 22 - 24, Remove the nonsensical placeholder
comment and either delete the line or replace it with a meaningful comment
describing NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY (e.g., what the key is for and where to
obtain it) and ensure the NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY= line remains as the sample
variable; also add a trailing newline at the end of the .env.example file to
satisfy linting.