Skip to content

Conversation

@pmora3003
Copy link
Contributor

@pmora3003 pmora3003 commented Jan 5, 2026

#143

CLR-S (2)

Pull Request | GrantChain

1. Issue Link

  • Closes #(issue number)

2. Brief Description of the Issue


3. Type of Change

Mark with an x all the checkboxes that apply (like [x]).

  • 📝 Documentation (updates to README, docs, or comments)
  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 👌 Enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

4. Changes Made

  • Change 1
  • Change 2
  • Change 3

5. Evidence Before Solution

Loom Video - Before Solution


6. Evidence After Solution

Loom Video - After Solution


7. Important Notes

  • Note 1
  • Note 2
  • Note 3

If you don't use this template, you'd be ignored

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated example environment configuration file formatting.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

An environment variable in .env.example was converted from an active but empty configuration line to a commented-out line, changing how the example demonstrates the variable without affecting any executable code.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Environment Configuration
\.env.example``
Commented out NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY= line (from active to commented state) to indicate the variable is optional or requires external configuration

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A comment marks the way,
One little line had its say,
Now dormant, waiting, sleeping sound,
For keys to fill the space profound!

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description uses the template structure but contains only placeholder values and does not fill in critical required sections with actual information about the changes. Fill in the template with actual details: Issue Link (#143), Brief Description, mark the appropriate Type of Change checkbox, list actual changes, and provide evidence or remove placeholder links.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'hello test' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about the changeset modifications to .env.example. Use a descriptive title that summarizes the main change, such as 'Comment out NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY in .env.example'.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Fix all issues with AI Agents 🤖
In @.env.example:
- Line 22: Add a trailing newline to the end of .env.example so the file ends
with a blank line (after the "NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=" line); this satisfies
dotenv-linter by ensuring the file ends with a newline character.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c161ae1 and 2c174ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .env.example
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-07-22T01:46:15.361Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: GrantChain/GrantFox PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/posthog-integration.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T01:46:15.361Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx} : Never hallucinate an API key. Instead, always use the API key populated in the .env file.

Applied to files:

  • .env.example
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
.env.example

[warning] 22-22: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file

(EndingBlankLine)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.env.example (1)

21-22: Clarify the intent of commenting out NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY.

The variable has been converted from an active (empty) configuration to a commented-out example. Please confirm whether this change is intentional and, if so, consider documenting why this variable is now optional. This helps developers understand the required vs. optional setup steps.


# RESEND API KEY FOR EMAILS
NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Add a blank line at the end of the file.

The file is missing a trailing newline, which is flagged by dotenv-linter. This is a minor formatting issue commonly addressed by adding a blank line at the end of the file.

🔎 Proposed fix
 # RESEND API KEY FOR EMAILS
-# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
+# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
# NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)

[warning] 22-22: [EndingBlankLine] No blank line at the end of the file

(EndingBlankLine)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.env.example around line 22, Add a trailing newline to the end of
.env.example so the file ends with a blank line (after the
"NEXT_PUBLIC_RESEND_API_KEY=" line); this satisfies dotenv-linter by ensuring
the file ends with a newline character.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants