Merged
Conversation
- isRemote and netcdf can't be used at the same time - netcdf doesnt yet work for 1D outputs
…is not implemented yet. you need to be pretty intentional about creating postGITM.exe so this shouldn't be a problem
aaronjridley
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2025
Contributor
aaronjridley
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These changes look fine to me. I think that we are moving the GITM and Aether output files closer toward each other, which is good.
I think that the GITM nc files should then work with pyitm, which is great. It is nice that we can now use the same plotting software for both. That is a huge step forward.
I am fine with moving the old plotting stuff into subdirectories.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[FEAT/etc.] Add ability to postprocess to netCDF, clean up srcPython (some)
Some features, some house-keeping...
Justification
Addresses #29 #54
Note
I'm open to debate on how the netcdf's are handled and whether we delete the silo-ed python codes.
Changes to GITM outputs
None.