Skip to content

Conversation

@tomudding
Copy link
Member

Description

The same flaw in the logic was fixed in abcb082
and dd94226 but somehow this part of the code
was missed.

Related issues/external references

N/A

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation improvement (no changes to code)
  • Other (please specify)

The same flaw in the logic was fixed in abcb082
and dd94226 but somehow this part of the code
was missed.
Now the same logic is used in all places. For someone to be considered part of
the BM/GMM body they must be installed today or in the past. Furthermore, they
may not have been discharged (if discharge in the future they are still part).
@tomudding tomudding force-pushed the fix/discharge-date-not-accounted-for-on-body-page branch from 53aebb0 to 5bac369 Compare June 19, 2025 10:57
@tomudding tomudding changed the title Fix/discharge date not accounted for on body page fix: improper membership checks for public BM/GMM body pages Jun 19, 2025
@tomudding tomudding merged commit e6fd86c into GEWIS:main Jun 19, 2025
4 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
Tom Udding: Merge pull request #2025 from tomudding/fix/discharge-date-not-accounted-for-on-body-page

fix: improper membership checks for public BM/GMM body pages

Co-authored-by: tomudding <tomudding@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant