dispose file streams before returning to get correct file size #85
Conversation
WalkthroughRefactors file write disposal to use nested await-using, adds a unit test verifying reported file sizes, updates project version to 1.4.0, and adds a changelog entry noting the fix for returning correct file size values. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
rect rgb(240,248,255)
participant Caller
participant WriteModule
participant FileSystem
end
Caller->>WriteModule: Write(filePath, content)
Note right of WriteModule: open FileStream (await using)
WriteModule->>FileSystem: create/open FileStream
WriteModule->>FileSystem: write bytes via StreamWriter (scoped await using)
FileSystem-->>WriteModule: write complete
Note right of WriteModule: dispose StreamWriter (end nested scope)\nthen dispose FileStream
WriteModule->>Caller: return Result(SizeInBytes, SizeInKiloBytes, SizeInMegaBytes)
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)Frends.*/Frends.*/*.cs⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
Frends.*/**/*.cs⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (3)
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.cs (3)
17-17: Address pipeline failure: Task class should be static.The static analyzer indicates that the task class 'Files' should be marked as static since it contains only static methods.
Apply this diff to fix:
-public class Files +public static class Files
112-112: Address CA2208: ArgumentOutOfRangeException needs paramName.The static analyzer indicates that ArgumentOutOfRangeException should be called with a message and/or paramName parameter.
Apply this diff to fix:
- throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); + throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(optionsFileEncoding), $"Unsupported file encoding: {optionsFileEncoding}");
26-26: Add CancellationToken parameter and implement required Success/Error properties in Result class.The pipeline issues are confirmed:
FT0007 (Write.cs:26): Missing
CancellationTokenparameter. AddCancellationToken cancellationToken = defaultto the Write method signature.FT0011 (Result.cs): Missing
Successproperty andErrorproperty. Per coding guidelines, task result classes must include:
Success(bool)- Task-specific return values (currently: Path, SizeInMegaBytes, etc.)
Errorobject withMessageandAdditionalInfoUpdate Result.cs to include these required properties.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.csproj (1)
4-4: Consider upgrading to .NET 8 for ongoing support.The project targets .NET 6, which reached end of support on November 12, 2024. While the coding guidelines allow either .NET 6 or 8, migrating to .NET 8 would ensure continued security updates and vendor support.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Frends.Files.Write/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs(1 hunks)Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.csproj(1 hunks)Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.cs
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.cs: Ensure every public method and class:
- Has
and XML comments
- If the documentation is very long then it can also use element
- Follows Microsoft C# code conventions
- Uses semantic task result documentation (e.g., Success, Error, Data)
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.cs: Validate all task result classes include:
- Success (bool)
- Task-specific return value (e.g. Data, FilePaths)
- Error object with Message and AdditionalInfo
- Ensure result structure is flat, simple, and avoids 3rd-party types.
- Use dynamic or JToken only when the structure is unknown.
Files:
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.csFrends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs
Frends.*/**/*.cs
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Frends.*/**/*.cs: Code must follow Microsoft C# coding standards, including:
- PascalCase for public members and task parameters
- Proper naming for abbreviations (Csv, Url, Api)
- Use of var only when type is obvious
- Clean structure and no unused code
Files:
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.csFrends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs
Frends.*/CHANGELOG.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Frends.*/CHANGELOG.md: Validate format against Keep a Changelog (https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/)
Include all functional changes and indicate breaking changes with upgrade notes.
Avoid notes like "refactored xyz" unless it affects functionality.
Files:
Frends.Files.Write/CHANGELOG.md
Frends.*/Frends.*.Tests/*
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Frends.*/Frends.*.Tests/*: Confirm unit tests exist and provide at least 80% coverage.
Tests should:
- Load secrets via dotenv
- Use mocking where real systems can't be simulated
- Follow Microsoft unit testing naming and structuring conventions
Files:
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.csproj
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.csproj: Ensure the .csproj targets .NET 6 or 8, uses the MIT license, and includes the following fields:
= Frends
= true
= MIT
Follow Microsoft C# project file conventions.
Files:
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.csproj
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs (2)
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/ImpersonationTests.cs (2)
Test(63-70)Test(72-84)Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.cs (4)
Task(26-33)Task(46-60)Task(62-74)Files(17-115)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Write_build_test
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.cs
[error] 112-112: CA2208: Call the ArgumentOutOfRangeException constructor that contains a message and/or paramName parameter
[error] 17-17: FT0004: Task class 'Files' should be static
[error] 26-26: FT0007: Task method is missing required parameter of type 'CancellationToken'
[error] 26-26: FT0011: Class should include a 'Success' property
[error] 26-26: FT0011: Class should include a 'Error' property
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.csproj
[error] 112-112: CA2208: Call the ArgumentOutOfRangeException constructor that contains a message and/or paramName parameter
[error] 17-17: FT0004: Task class 'Files' should be static
[error] 26-26: FT0007: Task method is missing required parameter of type 'CancellationToken'
[error] 26-26: FT0011: Class should include a 'Success' property
[error] 26-26: FT0011: Class should include a 'Error' property
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Frends.Files.Write/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-6: LGTM! Changelog entry follows Keep a Changelog format.The new version entry correctly documents the functional fix and follows the required format per coding guidelines.
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Write.cs (1)
67-71: LGTM! Explicit using blocks ensure proper disposal timing.The refactoring from using declarations to explicit using blocks ensures that the FileStream and StreamWriter are fully disposed (flushed and closed) before creating the Result object at line 73. This is the correct fix for the file size reporting issue.
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.csproj (1)
6-6: LGTM! Version bump aligns with the changelog.The version increment from 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 is appropriate for this bug fix release.
Frends.Files.Write/Frends.Files.Write.Tests/UnitTests.cs (1)
126-142: LGTM! Comprehensive test for file size reporting.The new test method effectively validates that all three size properties (SizeInBytes, SizeInKiloBytes, SizeInMegaBytes) accurately reflect the actual file size on disk. The test approach of using FileInfo to derive expected values and comparing them to the result properties provides strong validation of the fix.
| using var fileStream = new FileStream(input.Path, fileMode, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.Write, 4096, useAsync: true); | ||
| using var writer = new StreamWriter(fileStream, encoding); | ||
| await writer.WriteAsync(input.Content).ConfigureAwait(false); | ||
| using (var fileStream = new FileStream(input.Path, fileMode, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.Write, 4096, useAsync: true)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
change to
await using var fileStream =
new FileStream(input.Path, fileMode, FileAccess.Write, FileShare.Write, 4096, useAsync: true);
await using (var writer = new StreamWriter(fileStream, encoding))
{
await writer.WriteAsync(input.Content).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
return new Result(new FileInfo(input.Path));
[]# Frends Task Pull Request
Summary
Review Checklist
1. Frends Task Project Files
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.csproj<PackageLicenseExpression>MIT</PackageLicenseExpression>)<Version><Authors>Frends</Authors><Description><RepositoryUrl><GenerateDocumentationFile>true</GenerateDocumentationFile>2. File: FrendsTaskMetadata.json
Frends.*/Frends.*/FrendsTaskMetadata.json3. File: README.md
Frends.*/README.md4. File: CHANGELOG.md
Frends.*/CHANGELOG.md5. File: migration.json
Frends.*/Frends.*/migration.json6. Source Code Documentation
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.cs<summary>XML comments<example>XML comments<frendsdocs>XML comments, if needed7. GitHub Actions Workflows
.github/workflows/*.yml*_test.yml*_main.yml*_release.yml8. Task Result Object Structure
Frends.*/Frends.*/*.csSuccess(bool)Additional Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores
Documentation