Separate app.py into multiple files & better counting

[idk-maybe-none]

Separate app.py into multiple files, and make that counting now accepts mathematical expressions
I'm not sure that it works on 100%,

[Anonymous941]

Why does counting accept mathematical expressions? Just for fun?

[Anonymous941]

Also it's kind of hard to audit this, since it's such a large PR and git diff doesn't work. Not a huge deal but worth mentioning I guess

[idk-maybe-none]

Why does counting accept mathematical expressions? Just for fun?

yes

[ilovecats4606]

Why does counting accept mathematical expressions? Just for fun?

yes

Mandi's bot added it and i dont see a problem with it its kinda funny

[Anonymous941]

Why does counting accept mathematical expressions? Just for fun?

yes

Mandi's bot added it and i dont see a problem with it its kinda funny

I was just curious. Make sure people can't crash the bot by spamming 2^10000000 or something like that

[idk-maybe-none]

2^10000000

I didn't think of that
I'll test

[idk-maybe-none]

I think it's safe:

>>> evaluate("2**999999", {})
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: Exceeds the limit (4300) for integer string conversion; use sys.set_int_max_str_digits() to increase the limit

[Anonymous941]

That's a string conversion error, according to that it was still calculated somehow?? Maybe it used an approximation or the library uses ^ instead of **?

[Anonymous941]

It turns out 2**999999 isn't large enough and somehow it can calculate it anyway, then fails to turn it into an integer. But running evaluate("2**10000000000") causes it to freeze.

[Anonymous941]

expr.py has protection against DoS attacks, maybe you should use that instead...

[MandiHQ]

expr.py has protection against DoS attacks, maybe you should use that instead...

Updated my bot to be a bit more strict on the math equations and accept some more symbols.
Also, not coded in python.

[idk-maybe-none]

That's a string conversion error, according to that it was still calculated somehow?? Maybe it used an approximation or the library uses ^ instead of **?

My bad, didn't read the error message, and thanks for alternative, I'll implement that tomorrow

[idk-maybe-none]

Hello?