-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
CPP-2691 Implement build args options #1188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+20
−11
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cb1a91b
feat: implement buildArgs option using tool kit env yaml tag
zeinaaabbb 3e1040c
docs: automatically regenerate schema docs
zeinaaabbb a51932c
fix: make build args optional
zeinaaabbb 4233a6a
feat: add buildArgs to docker
zeinaaabbb efcff79
docs: automatically regenerate schema docs
zeinaaabbb 06e8d7e
fix: update toolkitrc.yml in how buildArgs are referenced under options
zeinaaabbb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work! A few questions here:
buildArgsa plugin option or a task option?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
they'd override these options
removing
GIT_COMMITand asking teams to configure it themselves would be a breaking change for thedockerplugin which would be good to avoid, that's why i suggested configuring it in the plugin.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is why I was wondering if it was better to not have any defaults that break unexpectedly when new buildArgs options are specified?
yeah that makes sense. we can have a deprecation notice period but we should eventually remove it when we have more stronger case for a breaking change. internally, i suspect only the storytelling team uses it at the moment