Skip to content

Conversation

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor

@abzokhattab abzokhattab commented Nov 25, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #74935
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Test 1: Image Loading Spinner in Full Image View
Steps:

  1. Open the app and navigate to a chat/report with an attached image
  2. Tap on the image to open it in full-screen view
  3. Observe the loading behavior (on slower connections or large images) and validate that the loading spinner have the same style as in prod and the go back button is not shown after 10sec of loading

Test 2: Thumbnail Image Loading in Chat/Report
Steps:

  1. Navigate to a conversation or expense report with image attachments
  2. Scroll to see image thumbnails load (especially on slower network or first load)
  3. Observe the loading behavior (on slower connections or large images) and validate that the loading spinner have the same style as in prod and the go back button is not shown after 10sec of loading

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-15.at.00.36.42.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-12-15.at.00.37.41.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-15.at.00.00.30.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-15.at.00.35.41.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-14.at.23.58.15.mov

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/Image/index.tsx 61.42% <ø> (ø)
src/components/ImageWithLoading.tsx 76.19% <ø> (ø)
.../components/MoneyRequestConfirmationListFooter.tsx 84.21% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
src/components/PDFThumbnail/index.native.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/PDFView/index.native.tsx 8.00% <ø> (-1.10%) ⬇️
src/components/PDFView/index.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/ImageView/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/PDFThumbnail/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/LoadingIndicator.tsx 25.00% <25.00%> (ø)
... and 85 files with indirect coverage changes

@abzokhattab abzokhattab force-pushed the fix/image-activity-indicator branch from 4e10c9f to 955a17a Compare November 25, 2025 14:33
@abzokhattab abzokhattab marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2025 00:00
@abzokhattab abzokhattab requested review from a team as code owners December 15, 2025 00:00
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and bernhardoj and removed request for a team December 15, 2025 00:00
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 15, 2025

@bernhardoj Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team December 15, 2025 00:00
@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

abzokhattab commented Dec 15, 2025

@Julesssss here is the second PR after this #75031

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

abzokhattab commented Dec 15, 2025

@Julesssss Since all of the new refactorings have the same styling that were in the FullscreenLoadingIndicator so instead of duplicating the styling over and over .. i created a shared component to be used and provide a cleaner code

Applied them on the PDF loaders as well.

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

There was also a bug in the loading indicator when creating an expense is not centered

Screen.Recording.2025-12-14.at.23.22.12.mov

so this is now fixed after using the shared component:

Screen.Recording.2025-12-15.at.01.28.09.mov

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

Is C+ needed here?

Copy link
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Product review not strictly required.

@Julesssss Julesssss self-requested a review December 22, 2025 21:24
@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Is C+ needed here?

Yes, please go ahead @bernhardoj

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

@abzokhattab please merge with main

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

There u go @bernhardoj

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

bernhardoj commented Dec 24, 2025

There was also a bug in the loading indicator when creating an expense is not centered

@abzokhattab I changed the pdf code so that it always shows the loading, but I can't seem to see the LoadingIndicator. If I change it to simple Text, then the text shows. Please see the video below:

web.mp4

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

From the 1st video, we can see there are 2 loading indicators

image

But from the 2nd video, the loading indicator of the PDF is missing.

image

const styles = useThemeStyles();

return (
<View style={[StyleSheet.absoluteFillObject, styles.fullScreenLoading, styles.w100, style]}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I remove the absolute style, then the loading indicator shows. Btw, I noticed that the structure here looks the same as the FullScreenLoadingIndicator, just without a back button. Maybe we should keep using plain ActivityIndicator for the pdf?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think its just cleaner this way since most of the instances are using the same styling inside the the Loading indicator so i believe its worth it to have this new component

Or we can keep the full screen loading indicator and add a param that would disable the backTo

What do you think

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or we can keep the full screen loading indicator and add a param that would disable the backTo

This is what is already happening right now, that's why we won't see the back button even without this PR, actually, but it's only temporary.

shouldUseGoBackButton = false,

{showGoBackButton && (
<View style={styles.loadingMessage}>
<View style={styles.pv4}>
<Text>{translate('common.thisIsTakingLongerThanExpected')}</Text>
</View>
<Button
text={translate('common.goBack')}
onPress={() => Navigation.goBack()}
/>
</View>
)}

I think its just cleaner this way since most of the instances are using the same styling inside the the Loading indicator so i believe its worth it to have this new component

I don't think there are that many components that show a loading indicator with this structure, but I get your point that most of the time, we want to show a loading indicator that is shown in the center, so I'm fine to keep the component, but we still need to fix the loading indicator on the PDF components.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay i fixed the loader for the pdf:

screen-recording-2025-12-24-at-184822_at52s52W.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I'm still unable to see it. Maybe there is some code that you forgot to push?

web.mp4

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you check now ... here is what i have

Screen.Recording.2025-12-27.at.10.32.25.mov

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

bernhardoj commented Dec 24, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android.mweb.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios.mweb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mp4

accessibilityLabel={translate('accessibilityHints.viewAttachment')}
disabled={!shouldDisplayReceipt}
disabledStyle={styles.cursorDefault}
style={[styles.h100, styles.flex1]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my testing, we don't need the flex1 style here.

<PDFThumbnail
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/non-nullable-type-assertion-style
previewSourceURL={resolvedReceiptImage as string}
style={[styles.w100, styles.h100]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my testing, we don't need the w100 style here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: we can even remove the h100 style here and here

if (isPDFThumbnail) {
return (
<PDFThumbnail
previewSourceURL={source ?? ''}
style={[styles.w100, styles.h100]}

Then, we can always apply the h100 here instead of only when it fails

return (
<View style={[style, styles.overflowHidden, failedToLoad && styles.h100]}>

and move the style prop to the last item of the array.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm i removed the w100 but i see that most of the occureneces have both styles.w100, styles.h100 i am not sure if we should remove that but can u please check if it will cause any regressions ...

i am fine with changing the App/src/components/ReceiptImage/index.tsx and PDFThumbnail/index.tsx but lets see if it will cause any issues

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

Please also fix the lint, and we are good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants