Skip to content

Conversation

@furtib
Copy link
Contributor

@furtib furtib commented Aug 13, 2025

Why: We should have a unit test for caching! (for #24 and #23)

What:
Created a test case that:

  • Analyzes a two-source file target
  • Edits one file from the two
  • Reruns the analysis, counts the number of files analyzed, with the subcommands option

Scope:

  • Limited: One acceptance is likely sufficient before merging.

Dpends on: #60

Addresses:

@furtib furtib self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@furtib
Copy link
Contributor Author

furtib commented Aug 15, 2025

Depends on #61

@furtib furtib force-pushed the test_caching branch 6 times, most recently from 989e988 to 339da35 Compare August 18, 2025 07:28
@furtib furtib requested review from Szelethus and Copilot August 18, 2025 08:20

This comment was marked as spam.

@furtib furtib requested a review from Szelethus August 25, 2025 08:35
@furtib furtib requested a review from Szelethus August 25, 2025 10:34
@Szelethus Szelethus added the test ☑️ Adding or refactoring tests label Aug 25, 2025
@furtib furtib requested a review from Szelethus August 25, 2025 10:56
Copy link
Contributor

@Szelethus Szelethus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Considering that ctu is a pain point, we should add a testcase for it as well.

@furtib furtib requested a review from Szelethus August 29, 2025 07:09
Copy link
Contributor

@Szelethus Szelethus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Szelethus Szelethus merged commit d6fc7f0 into Ericsson:main Aug 29, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test ☑️ Adding or refactoring tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants