Skip to content

Conversation

@rwb27
Copy link

@rwb27 rwb27 commented Nov 1, 2018

I've expanded on the specification, adding my understanding of the format, better formatting of the list, and a few details that were missing. I think this probably belongs in meta?

I've expanded on the specification, adding my understanding of the format, better formatting of the list, and a few details that were missing.  I think this probably belongs in `meta`?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant