-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
add hybrid fastcs/adodin eiger. moved from ophyd_async branch #1745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1745 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.10% 99.11% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 279 281 +2
Lines 10510 10650 +140
==========================================
+ Hits 10416 10556 +140
Misses 94 94 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
DominicOram
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I think this is mostly fine my only comments would be:
- Should: We should remove the one in
ophyd_asyncnow. I think that this is the only place it's used in DLS and I don't think it's yet used anywhere else. Otherwise having the two is confusing - Nit: I don't think the
adin the path or filename adds anything as we don't have one that's not AD yet and once we do we should prioritise moving to that so hopefully this isn't around for long. e.g. I would just call itsrc/dodal/devices/async_eiger/odin_io.py
| "python-envs.defaultEnvManager": "ms-python.python:system", | ||
| "python-envs.pythonProjects": [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Why were these added?
|
Also, FYI @jacob720, can you take a look at this as you've been working on it too? |
After discussions with @coretl and given the fact that we will be removing the adodin in order to only support fascs odin, the adodin module has been moved to dls-dodal in order to maintain compatibility until all EIger's have been moved to fascs odin
bluesky/ophyd-async#1128