Fix aarch64-linux again

[RossComputerGuy]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated CI/CD runner configuration for ARM-based Linux builds to use a more recent system image for improved compatibility and performance.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the GitHub Actions runner mapping for aarch64-linux from ubuntu-latest-arm to ubuntu-24.04-arm in the workflow configuration. This changes which ARM-based Ubuntu runner is selected for aarch64-linux targets in matrix-driven workflow execution.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Runner Configuration .github/workflows/workflow.yml	Updated aarch64-linux runner mapping from ubuntu-latest-arm to ubuntu-24.04-arm in the default runner-map

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single-line configuration update with no logic or functional changes
• Direct runner version specification change

Possibly related PRs

• Fix aarch64-linux #37: Modifies the same aarch64-linux runner-map entry in .github/workflows/workflow.yml with a different runner value.

Suggested reviewers

• colemickels

Poem

🐰 A runner takes flight, swift and true,
From latest-arm to 24.04's view,
The aarch64 hops with newfound grace,
Actions flow smoother in cyberspace! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description only contains the template comment about code formatting and lacks any substantive explanation of the changes, motivation, or context.	Add a meaningful description explaining what was changed, why it was necessary, and any relevant context or testing performed.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Fix aarch64-linux again' is vague and generic, using 'Fix' without specifying what was fixed or why the re-fix was necessary.	Provide a more specific title that describes the actual change, such as 'Update aarch64-linux runner from ubuntu-latest-arm to ubuntu-24.04-arm'.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/aarch64

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7c4120 and 170708b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/workflow.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: DeterminateCI / build (x86_64-linux, ubuntu-latest)
• GitHub Check: DeterminateCI / build (aarch64-darwin, macos-latest)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/workflow.yml (1)

44-49: Runner verification confirms ubuntu-24.04-arm is valid and actively available.

The change is sound. GitHub officially provides the ubuntu-24.04-arm hosted runner (arm64 architecture), and it is actively maintained as the current Ubuntu LTS option for ARM builds. Pinning from the floating ubuntu-latest-arm tag to a specific version improves reproducibility and stability, which aligns with the PR's intent to fix aarch64-linux issues.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}