Skip to content

[389, 397, 398, 399] Add api client flow#400

Merged
kennyevil merged 50 commits intomainfrom
feature/389-add-api-client-flow
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

[389, 397, 398, 399] Add api client flow#400
kennyevil merged 50 commits intomainfrom
feature/389-add-api-client-flow

Conversation

@kennyevil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Context

https://trello.com/c/7bmabknE/389-add-api-client-flow

Changes proposed in this pull request

Add flow for adding api clients

Guidance to review

@kennyevil kennyevil marked this pull request as draft February 25, 2026 09:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deployments

Review app is available at these URLs:
https://register-training-providers-pr-400.test.teacherservices.cloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@defong defong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably would of been candidate for CITEXT

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/citext.html

Then we don't have to bother with lower casing

A few other minor things to wrap up

Comment thread app/forms/api_client_form.rb Outdated
Comment thread spec/policies/api_client_policy.rb
Comment thread app/controllers/api_clients/confirmations_controller.rb
Comment thread app/helpers/api_client_helper.rb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tomtrentham tomtrentham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this error message looks a bit wonky:

Image

Comment thread app/models/api_client.rb
Co-authored-by: De Fong <470137+defong@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@defong defong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's get this in

@kennyevil kennyevil added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2026
@tomtrentham tomtrentham removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Apr 8, 2026
@kennyevil kennyevil added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tomtrentham tomtrentham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we get clarity on the client/token modelling please?

@tomtrentham tomtrentham removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Apr 8, 2026
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
Co-authored-by: Tom Trentham <1910056+tomtrentham@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: De Fong <470137+defong@users.noreply.github.com>
@kennyevil kennyevil added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 9, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit bcf3c8c Apr 9, 2026
13 checks passed
@kennyevil kennyevil deleted the feature/389-add-api-client-flow branch April 9, 2026 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants