You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I pushed some commits. I think it eventually works most of the time now ™️
I think the touch-rewrite was only half-done, think i fixed it in a sensible way.
I fixed metrics so it doesn't spawn a runtime (inside the runtime)
I enabled the secondary vault monitor config test.
There's some issues I am still debugging before I think it's ready for review by someone wiser than me. Writing them down here so I can keep track of where I am.
something is spamming
vm-test-run-faythe-vault-test> client # [ 32.872869] faythe[881]: [2024-10-18T08:52:39Z ERROR rustify::client] error=Server returned error
vm-test-run-faythe-vault-test> client # [ 32.873456] faythe[881]: [2024-10-18T08:52:39Z ERROR rustify::endpoint] error=Server returned error
vm-test-run-faythe-vault-test> client # [ 32.874041] faythe[881]: [2024-10-18T08:52:39Z ERROR vaultrs::api] Detected errors in API response: []
vm-test-run-faythe-vault-test> client # [ 32.874639] faythe[881]: [2024-10-18T08:52:39Z ERROR vaultrs::kv2] error=The Vault server returned an error (status code 404)
Haven't found out what yet. Probably part of the raw cert check.
faythe appears to set up too many challenges according to pebble. I've seen 5 challenges in the db at one time.
faythe appears to set up the wrong dns proofs sometime, getting stuck validating internally. Unsure why this happens.
sometimes there's nonce errors in the AcmeClient. I think this may simply be because of the default pebble setup vm-test-run-faythe-vault-test> acme # [ 5.144768] pebble[662]: Pebble 2024/10/18 08:52:12 Configured to reject 5% of good nonces -- but we should handle this (and maybe that'll fix some other issues? I do think I'm seeing them too often for the 5% to be the only reason)
I've fixed the remaining known bugs in our fork of acme_lib (tmp commit added while the fork change gets approved) -- at least I can now consistently run the test without failures...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.