Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

SSP Review Feedback for September 2022#5

Draft
aj-stein-nist wants to merge 4 commits intoCompton-US:mainfrom
aj-stein-nist:2-review-ssp
Draft

SSP Review Feedback for September 2022#5
aj-stein-nist wants to merge 4 commits intoCompton-US:mainfrom
aj-stein-nist:2-review-ssp

Conversation

@aj-stein-nist
Copy link
Collaborator

Feedback for AJ's review of the sample SSP, closes #2.

When using YAML, we still have to have an array of one item with a
scalar. We can still use the special scalar declaration `>-` but need it
to be in an array element.
Not 100% clear if this is invalid syntax, but the by-components were
double-indented and YAML validators did interpreted this as an embedded
closure/block and not more properties of the same statement in the array.
Per our discussion on the topic of generalized and making this MVP, we
may want to consider just giving the example app a name and pick yet
another random identifier. Leveraging SaaS and information might be a
confusing given the simplification of context we want.
I mean, isn't it?
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review SSP for App and MVP Data Elements for AC-8 Control Round-Trip

1 participant