-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Test/application: refactoring mock classes #250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: development
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
aa7a5c6 to
3b75b91
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## development #250 +/- ##
==============================================
+ Coverage 7.90% 9.75% +1.84%
==============================================
Files 122 122
Lines 3401 3404 +3
==============================================
+ Hits 269 332 +63
+ Misses 3132 3072 -60
📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more |
Co-authored-by: Mathias Mogensen <42929161+Xazin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathias Mogensen <42929161+Xazin@users.noreply.github.com>
d371019 to
354fe58
Compare
obella425
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a general comment, could these tests be split to their individual P.Rs instead of lumping them together
|
Merge conflicts - needs rebase |
5be7e86 to
77ff369
Compare
05db9fc to
1ac5990
Compare
|
@glitchpop-frenzy 👀 |
|
Noted, will do it this week! 😄 |
8906c8d to
649893f
Compare
Declaring all mock classes in test utilities.