Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 4, 2019. It is now read-only.

Feature/codeverification#20

Open
miladsalimiiii wants to merge 16 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/codeverification
Open

Feature/codeverification#20
miladsalimiiii wants to merge 16 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/codeverification

Conversation

@miladsalimiiii
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…itory , issue #13 , work on retrofit configuration , issue #14 , work on code verification view , issue #10
…sue #10 and code verification view model , issue #11 and add base view model
#14 , create user repository  , closed #13 , create verification code viewmodel , clsoed #11 , create verification code view , closed #10
@HankMody69
Copy link

@miladsalimiiii
Hello my good friend the problems inside your development are listed below:

  1. Switch your theme to newer and recommended Theme.MaterialComponents.DayNight.NoActionBar
  2. After clicking button it turns into unreadable color
  3. Stylex.xml font styles are a little bit off, extend from MaterialDesign TextView
  4. [Optinal] Add initUiComponents to BaseFragment.kt
  5. In CodeVerificationFragment added many properties of views that never been used.
  6. FragmentUtil is a class that includes a single companion object? :|

@Miladsalimiiiii Miladsalimiiiii requested review from ehsan-mashhadi and tina-t2 and removed request for EhsanMashhadi and TinaT2 July 28, 2019 05:28
@Miladsalimiiiii
Copy link

@miladsalimiiii
Hello my good friend the problems inside your development are listed below:

1. Switch your theme to newer and recommended Theme.MaterialComponents.DayNight.NoActionBar

2. After clicking button it turns into unreadable color

3. Stylex.xml font styles are a little bit off, extend from MaterialDesign TextView

4. [Optinal] Add initUiComponents to BaseFragment.kt

5. In CodeVerificationFragment added many properties of views that never been used.

6. FragmentUtil is a class that includes a single companion object? :|

Hi dear Ramtin
1-It will be fix after merging
2-I do not face with this situation
3-It will be fix after merging
4-Fixed
5-If it does not use in my new feature branch i remove them
6-Fixed

@Miladsalimiiiii Miladsalimiiiii requested review from ramtintk and tina-t2 and removed request for HankMody69 July 28, 2019 09:29
@tina-t2 tina-t2 force-pushed the feature/codeverification branch from 164ecca to aded398 Compare July 29, 2019 06:58
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants