-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
K-implicit (n,2n) fix #166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
K-implicit (n,2n) fix #166
Conversation
Added in the BEAVRS model with the D-bank partially inserted. Also fixed a flaw in the geometry where the outermost cell was defined such that there could be a rare particle lost between it and the geometry boundary.
Added more obscure channels to the multiplicative scattering tally in kImplicit.
| ! Assumes N_XNs are by implicit weight change | ||
| select case(MT) | ||
| case(N_2N) | ||
| case(N_2Nd, N_2N, N_2Na, N_2N2a, N_2Np, N_3Np, N_2N0:N_2Ncont) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| case(N_2Nd, N_2N, N_2Na, N_2N2a, N_2Np, N_3Np, N_2N0:N_2Ncont) | |
| case(N_2Nd, N_2N, N_2Na, N_2N2a, N_2Np, N_2N0:N_2Ncont) |
valeriaRaffuzzi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There might be conflicts with the BEAVRS input that was just merged in another PR.
Once the commits are sorted (just noting that the MT numbers were already there in a more compact form) this is good to go!
Co-authored-by: valeriaRaffuzzi <108435337+valeriaRaffuzzi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: valeriaRaffuzzi <108435337+valeriaRaffuzzi@users.noreply.github.com>
For consistency with inelastic scattering
valeriaRaffuzzi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this passes all the tests, I think this is ok now! Feel free to merge.
Previously k implicit only had a few multiplicative scattering channels it considered. This seemed to work well mostly, but, for JEFF with Be, this could cause significant keff bias. Hence I have added in MTs 875-891 which are discrete and continuous (n,2n) levels. These have also been added to endfConstants. I added a few others which we already had in endfConstants too, but in this case MTs 875-891 were the culprits.