Add unit tests for SettingsForm class #7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Test invalid form with missing required fields (email, name) - Test valid form saved without commit (commit=False) - Test valid form saved with commit (commit=True) - Test optional password field behavior (empty password doesn't change user password) All tests follow existing patterns and cover the three requested scenarios: 1) Form is invalid (missing fields) 2) Form is valid and saved but not committed 3) Form is valid and both saved and committed Co-Authored-By: Jude Partovi <jude@partovi.org>
Author
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add unit tests for SettingsForm class
Summary
Added comprehensive unit tests for the
SettingsFormclass inrealworld/accounts/tests.pyto improve test coverage. The newTestSettingsFormclass includes 4 test methods that cover the three scenarios requested:form.save(commit=False)updates the user object in memory but doesn't persist to databaseform.save(commit=True)updates and persists the user object to databaseAll tests follow the existing code patterns from
TestUserCreationFormand passed during development.Review & Testing Checklist for Human
python manage.py test realworld.accounts.tests.TestSettingsFormpassesrealworld/accounts/forms.pyNotes
Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/9ba429d1ec9744e19a7782d5803bb139
Requested by: Jude Partovi (@jpartovi)