Skip to content

Conversation

@devin-ai-integration
Copy link

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Improve comments views test coverage from 73% to 100%

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive test cases for the comments views to improve test coverage from 73% to 100%. The changes include:

  • New TestEditCommentView class with 4 test methods covering GET requests, valid/invalid POST requests, and unauthorized access
  • New TestDeleteCommentView class with 2 test methods covering successful deletion and unauthorized access
  • Enhanced TestAddCommentView class with an additional test for invalid form submission
  • Fixed form validation assertions to check form.errors in context instead of HTML content

The total test count increased from 33 to 40 tests, and overall project coverage improved from 92% to 94%.

Review & Testing Checklist for Human

Risk Level: 🟡 Medium - Test logic needs verification

  • Verify test assertions match actual behavior - Run a few manual tests through the UI to ensure the test expectations align with real application behavior
  • Check form validation error handling - Confirm that form validation errors are properly handled (I changed assertions from checking HTML to checking form.errors)
  • Validate authorization edge cases - Test that unauthorized users truly cannot edit/delete others' comments
  • Run full test suite locally - Ensure all 40 tests pass and no regressions were introduced

Recommended Test Plan:

  1. Start the development server and create a test article with comments
  2. Try editing/deleting comments as the owner vs non-owner
  3. Submit invalid comment forms to verify error handling
  4. Run coverage run --source='.' manage.py test && coverage report to confirm coverage

Diagram

%%{ init : { "theme" : "default" }}%%
graph TB
    subgraph Legend
        L1["Major Edit"]:::major-edit
        L2["Minor Edit"]:::minor-edit  
        L3["Context/No Edit"]:::context
    end
    
    views["realworld/comments/views.py<br/>add_comment, edit_comment, delete_comment"]:::context
    tests["realworld/comments/tests.py<br/>+TestEditCommentView<br/>+TestDeleteCommentView<br/>Enhanced TestAddCommentView"]:::major-edit
    models["realworld/comments/models.py<br/>Comment model"]:::context
    forms["realworld/comments/forms.py<br/>CommentForm"]:::context
    
    tests -->|"tests all view functions"| views
    views -->|"uses"| models
    views -->|"uses"| forms
    tests -->|"creates test data"| models
    
    classDef major-edit fill:#90EE90
    classDef minor-edit fill:#87CEEB  
    classDef context fill:#FFFFFF
Loading

Notes

  • The comment form template doesn't display validation errors in HTML (unlike other forms in the project), which is why I had to change the validation test assertions
  • Authorization is enforced at the view level using get_object_or_404(Comment, author=request.user, pk=comment_id)
  • All tests use Django's test client with force_login() to simulate authenticated requests

Session Details:

- Add TestEditCommentView with GET/POST valid/invalid tests
- Add TestDeleteCommentView with authorization tests
- Add invalid form test for TestAddCommentView
- Improve comments/views.py coverage from 73% to 100%
- All 8 comment tests now pass, total test count: 40

Co-Authored-By: Shawn Azman <shawn.d.azman@gmail.com>
@devin-ai-integration
Copy link
Author

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

  • Address comments on this PR. Add '(aside)' to your comment to have me ignore it.
  • Look at CI failures and help fix them

Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository.

⚙️ Control Options:

  • Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant