Skip to content

Conversation

@JhanSrbinovsky
Copy link
Collaborator

@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky commented Oct 30, 2024

CABLE

The same module name can indeed be USEd as there are seperate versions picked up by coupled/offline apps. However some additional plumbing needs to be tweaked offline.

Please see issue for further details:
Fixes #436

Type of change

Checklist

  • The new content is accessible and located in the appropriate section.
  • I have checked that links are valid and point to the intended content.
  • I have checked my code/text and corrected any misspellings

Please add a reviewer when ready for review.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cable--446.org.readthedocs.build/en/446/

@JhanSrbinovsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@har917 you're tagged in the issue but perhaps here is more appropriate

Indent issue.
@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky added the priority:high High priority issues that should be included in the next release. label Nov 6, 2024
@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky added this to the ESM1.6 FastTrack milestone Nov 6, 2024
…ne-we-can-get-round-the-need-for-this-by-modifying-the-files-names-in-the-offlinecoupled-codebases-to-be-the-same
@JhanSrbinovsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bschroeter can you have a look at this. The next tranche of AM3 updates will be much simpler if this does in first

@JhanSrbinovsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bschroeter can you have a look at this. The next tranche of AM3 updates will be much simpler if this does in first

Actually to get ESM1,6 to work as well - so Labels etc will be updated

Copy link
Member

@ccarouge ccarouge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's fine for me. I've made a commit (so pull before pushing if needed) to align all the USE statements where it was obviously needed from the changes view.

Is there a plan to change cable_surface_types.F90 to a namelist down the track?

@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky merged commit af51c0a into main Nov 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky deleted the 436-ifdef-okay-for-now-but-surely-for-this-one-we-can-get-round-the-need-for-this-by-modifying-the-files-names-in-the-offlinecoupled-codebases-to-be-the-same branch November 24, 2024 23:02
@JhanSrbinovsky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Is there a plan to change cable_surface_types.F90 to a namelist down the track?

absolutely

@JhanSrbinovsky JhanSrbinovsky restored the 436-ifdef-okay-for-now-but-surely-for-this-one-we-can-get-round-the-need-for-this-by-modifying-the-files-names-in-the-offlinecoupled-codebases-to-be-the-same branch November 25, 2024 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority:high High priority issues that should be included in the next release.

Projects

None yet

4 participants