Skip to content

Conversation

@sathvik3103
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@build-canada-deploy-bot
Copy link

build-canada-deploy-bot bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Dokploy Preview Deployment

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nextjs ✅ Done Preview URL 2026-01-09T01:40:42.690Z

@melkuo
Copy link
Contributor

melkuo commented Jan 2, 2026

Thanks @sathvik3103 !!

  1. I'm seeing $74.1B in expenses leading to a $8.3B surplus in the Consolidated Statement of Operations table. Versus $74B in expenses leading to a $8.37B in surplus in the Sankey. Any idea why the numbers are slightly off?

  2. @jclarkin has been working on a way with @xrendan to include multiple years of data: Add Year-Based Routing for Provincial and Municipal Jurisdictions #228. Would you guys be able to chime in on how we want to handle this?

@melkuo melkuo requested a review from xrendan January 2, 2026 15:55
@sathvik3103
Copy link
Contributor Author

i will take a look at the numbers and let you know.

@sathvik3103
Copy link
Contributor Author

found the reason for spending mismatch. I forgot to add 0.144 towards "Legislative Assembly" as this is not specified as a separate ministry in the list of statements here
but it is present in year-end report's expenses (page 7). It is now 74.15B

i think the surplus is also adjust now. 8.32B

this isn't acceptable for someone who works 500m away from the leg building 😜

@melkuo
Copy link
Contributor

melkuo commented Jan 8, 2026

Looks good to me. It might be worth filling in the (relatively new) Methodology section to explain how you got the numbers that you did. I would include that you got top-level figures from the Annual Report, ministry data from each ministry's respective page, and anything you did to make the figures match.

@sathvik3103
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2026-01-08 at 6 36 32 PM done. added methodology

@melkuo
Copy link
Contributor

melkuo commented Jan 13, 2026

@xrendan can you review?

@xrendan xrendan merged commit ff209a4 into main Jan 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants