Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo contract deployment payloads in a shell script were replaced with updated bytecode values for EtherSwap and ERC20Swap deployments. The surrounding control flow and logic remain unchanged; only the hexadecimal bytecode data was modified. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
images/scripts/utils.sh (1)
377-380: Consider externalizing these bytecode blobs and validating them by hash.Keeping very large creation bytecode inline makes accidental truncation/typos hard to catch in future edits. A small guard (e.g., load from artifact file + assert expected hash) would improve reliability.
Example direction
+ETHERSWAP_BYTECODE="$(cat /path/to/EtherSwap.bytecode)" +ERC20SWAP_BYTECODE="$(cat /path/to/ERC20Swap.bytecode)" + +# optional: verify expected digests before deploying +# echo -n "$ETHERSWAP_BYTECODE" | sha256sum | grep -q "<expected>" +# echo -n "$ERC20SWAP_BYTECODE" | sha256sum | grep -q "<expected>" + - deploy_contract 0x... + deploy_contract "$ETHERSWAP_BYTECODE" - deploy_contract 0x... + deploy_contract "$ERC20SWAP_BYTECODE"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@images/scripts/utils.sh` around lines 377 - 380, The large inline creation bytecode passed to deploy_contract (the two long deploy_contract invocations, including the one labeled "ERC20Swap") should be moved into separate artifact files and validated by hash at runtime: remove the inline hex blobs and instead read the artifact files (e.g., erc20swap.bytecode, <other>.bytecode) in utils.sh, compute a checksum (sha256) and compare against an EXPECTED_HASH_<CONTRACT> constant before calling deploy_contract with the loaded blob; add clear error handling that aborts deployment if the hash mismatches to prevent accidental truncation/typos.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@images/scripts/utils.sh`:
- Around line 377-380: The large inline creation bytecode passed to
deploy_contract (the two long deploy_contract invocations, including the one
labeled "ERC20Swap") should be moved into separate artifact files and validated
by hash at runtime: remove the inline hex blobs and instead read the artifact
files (e.g., erc20swap.bytecode, <other>.bytecode) in utils.sh, compute a
checksum (sha256) and compare against an EXPECTED_HASH_<CONTRACT> constant
before calling deploy_contract with the loaded blob; add clear error handling
that aborts deployment if the hash mismatches to prevent accidental
truncation/typos.
Summary by CodeRabbit