-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
fix improve error handling #4117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
krushnarout
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/connection-refused
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While returning a synthetic 503 response prevents an exception from propagating and potentially crashing the app, it silently swallows the underlying error in production builds. The
debugPrintcall is stripped out in release builds, meaning you will lose all visibility into these failures.The previous approach of throwing the error was better because it allowed the calling layer (
makeApiCall) to catch the specific exception, report it to a crash monitoring service like Crashlytics, and then decide on a graceful failure path (like returningnull).Hiding errors this way can make debugging production issues extremely difficult. If a
nullresponse frommakeApiCallwas causing a crash, the fix should be applied at the call site to handle thenullcase gracefully, rather than altering the HTTP manager to stop reporting errors.I recommend reverting this change to ensure failures are properly logged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gemini-code-assist throwing network errors caused many crashes when the server went offline. Returning a 503 avoids app crashes and unnecessary Crashlytics noise. What approach would you suggest to handle this more safely?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You've raised a very valid point, @krushnarout. The goal is indeed to prevent app crashes due to transient network issues and avoid flooding Crashlytics with 'noise' from expected server unavailability, while still maintaining visibility into these failures for debugging and monitoring.
My previous suggestion to re-throw the error would indeed lead to crashes if not handled robustly upstream, and your current
debugPrintapproach, while preventing crashes, loses all visibility in production builds.A safer and more robust approach is to leverage a dedicated error reporting service like Crashlytics, which your project already uses (
app/lib/utils/debugging/crashlytics_manager.dart). Instead of re-throwing or silently printing, you can log these network errors as non-fatal events.This allows you to:
I recommend replacing the
debugPrintwith a call toCrashlyticsManager.recordError, ensuring you passfatal: falseto categorize it correctly. Ideally, theStackTracecaptured when the exception was originally caught should be passed for the most accurate debugging information.